Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25861340›Full record

ArticleTuberculosis and respiratory diseases2015

Outcomes and use of therapeutic drug monitoring in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients treated in virginia, 2009-2014.

Scott K Heysell, Jane L Moore, Charles A Peloquin, David Ashkin, Eric R Houpt

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. d-Cycloserine Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics, Susceptibility, and Dosing Implications in Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis: A Faustian Deal.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Within-host population dynamics of extensively drug-resistantEvolution, medicine, and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Therapeutic drug monitoring in tuberculosis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott K HeysellDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jane L MooreTuberculosis Control and Newcomer Health, Virginia Department of Health, Richmond, VA, USA.
Charles A PeloquinCollege of Pharmacy and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David AshkinSoutheastern National Tuberculosis Center and the University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Eric R HouptDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
University of Virginia · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Clinical Impact of Anti-TB Drug Levels and M. Tuberculosis SusceptibilityK23AI099019 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HEYSELL, SCOTT K · 2012 to 2016
$649k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI099019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReports of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for second-line medications to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remain limited.

methodsA retrospective cohort from the Virginia state tuberculosis (TB) registry, 2009-2014, was analyzed for TDM usage in MDR-TB. Drug concentrations, measured at time of estimated peak (Cmax), were compared to expected ranges.

resultsOf 10 patients with MDR-TB, 8 (80%) had TDM for at least one drug (maximum 6 drugs). Second-line drugs tested were cycloserine in seven patients (mean C2hr, 16.6±10.2 µg/mL; 4 [57%] below expected range); moxifloxacin in five (mean C2hr, 3.2±1.5 µg/mL; 1 [20%] below); capreomycin in five (mean C2hr, 21.5±14.0 µg/mL; 3 [60%] below); para-aminosalicylic acid in five (mean C6hr, 65.0±29.1 µg/mL; all within or above); linezolid in three (mean C2hr, 11.4±4.1 µg/mL, 1 [33%] below); amikacin in two (mean C2hr, 35.3±3.7 µg/mL; 1 [50%] below); ethionamide in one (C2hr, 1.49 µg/mL, within expected). Two patients died: a 38-year-old woman with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome and TB meningitis without TDM, and a 76-year-old man with fluoroquinolone-resistant (pre-extensively drug-resistant) pulmonary TB and low linezolid and capreomycin concentrations.

conclusionIndividual pharmacokinetic variability was common. A more standardized approach to TDM for MDR-TB may limit over-testing and maximize therapeutic gain.

Indexed as

CapreomycinCycloserineLinezolidMoxifloxacinPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID25861340
PMCPMC4388904
OpenAlexW2072027560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.