ReviewCancer informatics2015
HCsnip: An R Package for Semi-supervised Snipping of the Hierarchical Clustering Tree.
Review in Cancer informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimorbidity patterns and influencing factors in older Chinese adults: a national population-based cross-sectional survey.Journal of global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hierarchical clustering (HC) is one of the most frequently used methods in computational biology in the analysis of high-dimensional genomics data. Given a data set, HC outputs a binary tree leaves of which are the data points and internal nodes represent clusters of various sizes. Normally, a fixed-height cut on the HC tree is chosen, and each contiguous branch of data points below that height is considered as a separate cluster. However, the fixed-height branch cut may not be ideal in situations where one expects a complicated tree structure with nested clusters. Furthermore, due to lack of utilization of related background information in selecting the cutoff, induced clusters are often difficult to interpret. This paper describes a novel procedure that aims to automatically extract meaningful clusters from the HC tree in a semi-supervised way. The procedure is implemented in the R package HCsnip available from Bioconductor. Rather than cutting the HC tree at a fixed-height, HCsnip probes the various way of snipping, possibly at variable heights, to tease out hidden clusters ensconced deep down in the tree. The cluster extraction process utilizes, along with the data set from which the HC tree is derived, commonly available background information. Consequently, the extracted clusters are highly reproducible and robust against various sources of variations that "haunted" high-dimensional genomics data. Since the clustering process is guided by the background information, clusters are easy to interpret. Unlike existing packages, no constraint is placed on the data type on which clustering is desired. Particularly, the package accepts patient follow-up data for guiding the cluster extraction process. To our knowledge, HCsnip is the first package that is able to decomposes the HC tree into clusters with piecewise snipping under the guidance of patient time-to-event information. Our implementation of the semi-supervised HC tree snipping framework is generic, and can be combined with other algorithms that operate on detected clusters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.