Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25861213›Full record

ReviewCancer informatics2015

HCsnip: An R Package for Semi-supervised Snipping of the Hierarchical Clustering Tree.

Askar Obulkasim, Mark A van de Wiel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Askar ObulkasimDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark A van de WielDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ; Department of Mathematics, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hierarchical clustering (HC) is one of the most frequently used methods in computational biology in the analysis of high-dimensional genomics data. Given a data set, HC outputs a binary tree leaves of which are the data points and internal nodes represent clusters of various sizes. Normally, a fixed-height cut on the HC tree is chosen, and each contiguous branch of data points below that height is considered as a separate cluster. However, the fixed-height branch cut may not be ideal in situations where one expects a complicated tree structure with nested clusters. Furthermore, due to lack of utilization of related background information in selecting the cutoff, induced clusters are often difficult to interpret. This paper describes a novel procedure that aims to automatically extract meaningful clusters from the HC tree in a semi-supervised way. The procedure is implemented in the R package HCsnip available from Bioconductor. Rather than cutting the HC tree at a fixed-height, HCsnip probes the various way of snipping, possibly at variable heights, to tease out hidden clusters ensconced deep down in the tree. The cluster extraction process utilizes, along with the data set from which the HC tree is derived, commonly available background information. Consequently, the extracted clusters are highly reproducible and robust against various sources of variations that "haunted" high-dimensional genomics data. Since the clustering process is guided by the background information, clusters are easy to interpret. Unlike existing packages, no constraint is placed on the data type on which clustering is desired. Particularly, the package accepts patient follow-up data for guiding the cluster extraction process. To our knowledge, HCsnip is the first package that is able to decomposes the HC tree into clusters with piecewise snipping under the guidance of patient time-to-event information. Our implementation of the semi-supervised HC tree snipping framework is generic, and can be combined with other algorithms that operate on detected clusters.

Indexed as

data integrationhierarchical clusteringhigh-dimensional dataR packagesemi-supervised clustering

Identifiers

PMID25861213
PMCPMC4372030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.