Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25861113›Full record

ArticleJournal of nematology2015

Experimental studies with nematodes in ecotoxicology: an overview.

Arne Hägerbäumer, Sebastian Höss, Peter Heininger, Walter Traunspurger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Xenobiotic metabolism and transport inJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Critical reviews in toxicology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arne HägerbäumerDepartment of Animal Ecology, University of Bielefeld, Konsequenz 45, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Sebastian HössEcossa, Giselastr. 6, 82319 Starnberg, Germany.
Peter HeiningerGerman Federal Institute of Hydrology, Mainzer Tor 1, 56968 Koblenz, Germany.
Walter TraunspurgerDepartment of Animal Ecology, University of Bielefeld, Konsequenz 45, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With respect to their high abundances, their role as intermediaries between microorganisms and higher trophic levels, and their ubiquitous occurrence in all habitats, nematodes are of strong potential interest as environmental indicators. Ecotoxicological methods to evaluate the risk of anthropogenic pollutants on ecosystems require both in vitro and in vivo toxicity tests to investigate either mechanisms or pathways of toxicity and to set accurate toxicity thresholds. For this, the interest in nematodes as model organisms in ecotoxicology increased over the past few decades and existing appropriate experimental methods are reviewed in this manuscript. An overview of the various existing ecotoxicological tools for nematodes, ranging from molecular laboratory methods to experimental model ecosystem approaches, and their role as indicator organisms is given. The reviewed studies, approaches that range from species-based to community-based methods, reveal exciting possibilities for the future use of nematodes in ecotoxicological studies. Suitable ecotoxicological tools and ecological indices for nematodes should be integrated in weight-of-evidence approaches for assessing the ecological risk of contamination.

Indexed as

chemicalscontaminationecologyecotoxicologyfree-livingfreshwatermarinemethodsmicrocosmsmodel ecosystemsmolecularNemaSPEAR[%] indexreviewsingle speciessoil

Identifiers

PMID25861113
PMCPMC4388576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.