ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2015
Scholarly contributions of required senior research projects in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum.
Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Extramural Presentations and Publications from Pharmacy Student Research Programs.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Pooled it
- Identifying Student Research Project Impact Using the Buxton and Hanney Payback Framework.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2023Article
- Experiences of hospital allied health professionals in collaborative student research projects: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Development and Pilot Implementation of a Training Framework to Prepare and Integrate Pharmacy Students into a Multicentre Hospital Research Study.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- How-To Guide for Overcoming Barriers of Research and Scholarship Training in Pharm.D. and Pharmacy Residency Programs.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2021Article
- Implementation and Initial Evaluation of a Research and Scholarship Training Pathway in a Doctor of Pharmacy Curriculum.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021Article
- Fostering PharmD Skills Related to Research and Quality Improvement Through Mentored Projects.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2020Article
- Factors Associated with Publication of Research Projects from a Canadian Master of Science Degree Programme in Physical Therapy.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2020Article
- Effect of a Dedicated Pharmacy Student Summer Research Program on Publication Rate.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017Article
- Teaching Research Skills to Student Pharmacists in One Semester: An Applied Research Elective.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017Article
- A descriptive investigation of the impact of student research projects arising from elective research courses.BMC research notes · 2016Article
- Outcomes of a Multi-faceted Educational Intervention to Increase Student Scholarship.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine dissemination outcomes and faculty perceptions of senior research projects conducted from 2008 to 2011 by PharmD students in a curricular pathway focused on direct patient care.
methodsPreceptors' reported dissemination outcomes of research projects were surveyed and their perceptions of the precepting experience were rated using a web-based survey. Results were compared to those from an earlier pharmaceutical care cohort (2002-2007) and a combined cohort of 2, more research-intensive curricular pathways at the school.
resultsThe overall response rate was 90.2%. Project dissemination included 61.3% at an institutional forum, 42.3% as a submitted publication, 37.8% as a poster, and 4.5% as an oral presentation. Projects completed from 2008-2011 were significantly more likely than those from 2002-2007 to be submitted for publication (42.3% vs 10.7%, p<0.001) and published (28.8% vs 5.3%, p<0.001). Most preceptors found their research projects valuable to them professionally (88.3%) and to their own or another institution (83.5% and 78.5%, respectively). Ninety-five percent of preceptors would precept again.
conclusionDissemination rates for pharmaceutical care projects increased over time. Despite modest dissemination levels, the majority of preceptors agreed that required student research projects provide a valuable learning experience for students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.