Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25860967›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Importance of operational factors in the reproducibility of Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immune assay.

Nicolas Guigue, Samuel Lardeux, Alexandre Alanio, Samia Hamane, Marc Tabouret, Stéphane Bretagne

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances in the diagnosis of fungal pneumonias.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CirculatingFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas GuigueLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Groupe hospitalier Lariboisière-Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Samuel LardeuxBio-Rad Laboratories, Steenvoorde, France.
Alexandre AlanioLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Groupe hospitalier Lariboisière-Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; CNRS URA3012, Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, Unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, Centre National de Référence Mycoses Invasives et Antifongiques, Paris, France.
Samia HamaneLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Groupe hospitalier Lariboisière-Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France.
Marc TabouretBio-Rad Laboratories, Steenvoorde, France.
Stéphane BretagneLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Groupe hospitalier Lariboisière-Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; CNRS URA3012, Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, Unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, Centre National de Référence Mycoses Invasives et Antifongiques, Paris, France.
Hôpital Lariboisière · FRBio-Rad (France) · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Platelia Aspergillus Ag assay (Bio-Rad) is designed for detecting Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) and is widely used for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis but is hampered by variable occurrences of unreproducible positive results. Frequency and origin of these unreproducible results have not been formally studied.

methodsDifferent technicians simultaneously performed four tests on 550 consecutive sera from adult patients (Test#1-Test#2 for extraction#1 and Test#3-Test#4 for extraction#2). The samples were classified as confirmed negative [all tests with GM optical density index (GM-ODI) <0.5], confirmed positive (all tests with GM-ODI ≥0.5), extraction unreproducible positive (Test#1 and Test#2 ODIs ≥0.5, and Test#3 and Test#4 GM-ODIs <0.5, or conversely), and ELISA unreproducible positive (only one test with GM-ODI ≥0.5). The samples with positive and negative GM-ODIs within the assay coefficient of variation values were classified as non-conclusive. Four similar additional tests were performed after ≤72h storage at 4 °C and a new GM test after 8 months at -20 °C.

resultsFive-hundred-twenty sera (94.5%) were confirmed negative, 15 (2.7%) confirmed positive, 4 (0.7%) extraction unreproducible positive, 6 (1.1%) ELISA unreproducible positive, and 5 (0.9%) non-conclusive. Upon retesting, the unreproducible positive results turned negative except for one which turned non-conclusive. The confirmed positive and non-conclusive had similar GM-ODIs (p>0.4) upon retesting after storage ≤72h at 4 °C (n = 20) or eight months at -20 °C (n = 17).

conclusionsOperational unreproducible positives represent 33% of the GM-positive results and a second sample evaluation appears mandatory to avoid useless investigations or treatments. When operational artifacts are excluded, GM remains stable at standard storage conditions.

Indexed as

AdultAntigens, FungalAspergillosisAspergillusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFalse Positive ReactionsGalactoseHumansMannansReproducibility of ResultsAntigens, FungalgalactomannanGalactoseMannans

Identifiers

PMID25860967
PMCPMC4393237
OpenAlexW2001521382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.