ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2015
Talc pleurodesis improves survival of patients with malignant pleural effusions: case-control study.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Case of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Following Pleurodesis With Talc.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2023Article
- The Inflammatory Cytokine Profile of Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion Treated with Pleurodesis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study is to investigate whether there was a considerable difference in the survival of patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) depending on the pleural effusion treatment option.
methodsOne hundred and seven patients with proven MPE (metastatic lung and breast cancer) were included in the retrospective study. Fifty six patients were treated with talc pleurodesis and a control group of 51 patients with similar characteristics (in age, sex and disease) were treated with serial thoracentesis. The patients of both groups underwent chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The overall survival and the survival in subgroups of patients with different tumour types and different performance status (PS) equal 1, 2 and 3 were compared.
resultsThe patients who underwent talc pleurodesis had a longer average survival interval (MS) than the patients without such a treatment (n = 56; MS = 21,5 and n = 51; MS = 9 weeks, respectively; p < 0.001). The best results were achieved in patients with PS 1 (n = 16; MS = 35.5 and n = 10; MS = 11 weeks in the groups with and without talc pleurodesis, respectively; p < 0,001) and PS 2 (n = 27; MS = 21 and n = 30; MS = 10 weeks in the groups with and without talc pleurodesis, respectively; p < 0.001), whereas talc pleurodesis was not effective in PS 3 patients (n = 13; MS = 10 and n = 11; MS = 7 weeks in the groups with and without talc pleurodesis, respectively; p = 0.08). Patients with the breast cancer showed a longer average survival interval after pleurodesis than those with the lung cancer (n = 12; MS = 37.5 and n = 4; MS = 20 weeks in the group with the breast cancer and with the lung cancer, respectively; p < 0.001), whereas the median survival was not significantly different between those patients without pleurodesis (n = 10; MS = 10 and n = 41; MS = 9 weeks in the group with the breast cancer and lung cancer, respectively; p = 0.11).
conclusionThe patients treated with talc pleurodesis had a significantly longer average survival than the patients without such a treatment, especially in the group with the breast cancer and in groups with better performance status. This may indicate that talc pleurodesis, apart from its symptomatic effect on the cessation of pleural effusion, may have a direct antitumour effect as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.