Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25860834›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicinal chemistry2015

pkCSM: Predicting Small-Molecule Pharmacokinetic and Toxicity Properties Using Graph-Based Signatures.

Douglas E V Pires, Tom L Blundell, David B Ascher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,893 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,893citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,893 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phytochemical study ofPharmaceutical biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Language of Toxicity: An eXplainable Artificial Intelligence Approach.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. IntegratedACS omega · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,833 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Douglas E V Pires†Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Sanger Building, Cambridge, Cambridgshire CB2 1GA, U.K.
Tom L Blundell†Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Sanger Building, Cambridge, Cambridgshire CB2 1GA, U.K.
David B Ascher†Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Sanger Building, Cambridge, Cambridgshire CB2 1GA, U.K.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M026302/1Medical Research Council MR/N501864/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug development has a high attrition rate, with poor pharmacokinetic and safety properties a significant hurdle. Computational approaches may help minimize these risks. We have developed a novel approach (pkCSM) which uses graph-based signatures to develop predictive models of central ADMET properties for drug development. pkCSM performs as well or better than current methods. A freely accessible web server (http://structure.bioc.cam.ac.uk/pkcsm), which retains no information submitted to it, provides an integrated platform to rapidly evaluate pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacokineticsSoftwareAnimalsCaco-2 CellsCyprinidaeDatabases, PharmaceuticalDrug DesignHumansModels, TheoreticalRatsSmall Molecule LibrariesTetrahymena pyriformisToxicity TestsUser-Computer InterfaceSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID25860834
PMCPMC4434528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.