Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25860693›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

GeneSippr: a rapid whole-genome approach for the identification and characterization of foodborne pathogens such as priority Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli.

Dominic Lambert, Catherine D Carrillo, Adam G Koziol, Paul Manninger, Burton W Blais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic Analysis of Virulence Potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Draft Genome Sequences ofGenome announcements · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A Primer on Infectious Disease Bacterial Genomics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominic LambertResearch and Development, Ottawa Laboratory Carling, Science Branch, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine D CarrilloResearch and Development, Ottawa Laboratory Carling, Science Branch, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Adam G KoziolResearch and Development, Ottawa Laboratory Carling, Science Branch, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Paul ManningerResearch and Development, Ottawa Laboratory Carling, Science Branch, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Burton W BlaisResearch and Development, Ottawa Laboratory Carling, Science Branch, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timely identification and characterization of foodborne bacteria for risk assessment purposes is a key operation in outbreak investigations. Current methods require several days and/or provide low-resolution characterization. Here we describe a whole-genome-sequencing (WGS) approach (GeneSippr) enabling same-day identification of colony isolates recovered from investigative food samples. The identification of colonies of priority Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) (i.e., serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145 and O157) served as a proof of concept. Genomic DNA was isolated from single colonies and sequencing was conducted on the Illumina MiSeq instrument with raw data sampling from the instrument following 4.5 hrs of sequencing. Modeling experiments indicated that datasets comprised of 21-nt reads representing approximately 4-fold coverage of the genome were sufficient to avoid significant gaps in sequence data. A novel bioinformatic pipeline was used to identify the presence of specific marker genes based on mapping of the short reads to reference sequence libraries, along with the detection of dispersed conserved genomic markers as a quality control metric to assure the validity of the analysis. STEC virulence markers were correctly identified in all isolates tested, and single colonies were identified within 9 hrs. This method has the potential to produce high-resolution characterization of STEC isolates, and whole-genome sequence data generated following the GeneSippr analysis could be used for isolate identification in place of lengthy biochemical characterization and typing methodologies. Significant advantages of this procedure include ease of adaptation to the detection of any gene marker of interest, as well as to the identification of other foodborne pathogens for which genomic markers have been defined.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialChromosome MappingComputational BiologyDNA, BacterialDNA ProbesFood MicrobiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliDNA, BacterialDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID25860693
PMCPMC4393293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.