ArticlePloS one2015
GeneSippr: a rapid whole-genome approach for the identification and characterization of foodborne pathogens such as priority Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging illumina iSeq100 for whole genome sequencing of Salmonella Typhi for a resource-limited setting.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Closing the gap: Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10 sequencing allows comparable results to Illumina sequencing for SNP-based outbreak investigation of bacterial pathogens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of WGS performance for bacterial pathogen characterization with the Illumina technology optimized for time-critical situations.Microbial genomics · 2021Article
- Resistance determinants and their genetic context in enterobacteria from a longitudinal study of pigs reared under various husbandry conditions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Systematic Evaluation of Whole-Genome Sequencing Based Prediction of Antimicrobial Resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Identification of Novel Biomarkers for Priority Serotypes of Shiga Toxin-ProducingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Genetic Analysis of Virulence Potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Spfy: an integrated graph database for real-time prediction of bacterial phenotypes and downstream comparative analyses.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- Draft Genome Sequences ofGenome announcements · 2017Article
- Metagenomics: The Next Culture-Independent Game Changer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
- Multiplexed Single Intact Cell Droplet Digital PCR (MuSIC ddPCR) Method for Specific Detection of EnterohemorrhagicFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- A Primer on Infectious Disease Bacterial Genomics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016Review
- Navigating Microbiological Food Safety in the Era of Whole-Genome Sequencing.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016Review
- Whole Genome Sequencing for Genomics-Guided Investigations of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Outbreaks.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timely identification and characterization of foodborne bacteria for risk assessment purposes is a key operation in outbreak investigations. Current methods require several days and/or provide low-resolution characterization. Here we describe a whole-genome-sequencing (WGS) approach (GeneSippr) enabling same-day identification of colony isolates recovered from investigative food samples. The identification of colonies of priority Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) (i.e., serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145 and O157) served as a proof of concept. Genomic DNA was isolated from single colonies and sequencing was conducted on the Illumina MiSeq instrument with raw data sampling from the instrument following 4.5 hrs of sequencing. Modeling experiments indicated that datasets comprised of 21-nt reads representing approximately 4-fold coverage of the genome were sufficient to avoid significant gaps in sequence data. A novel bioinformatic pipeline was used to identify the presence of specific marker genes based on mapping of the short reads to reference sequence libraries, along with the detection of dispersed conserved genomic markers as a quality control metric to assure the validity of the analysis. STEC virulence markers were correctly identified in all isolates tested, and single colonies were identified within 9 hrs. This method has the potential to produce high-resolution characterization of STEC isolates, and whole-genome sequence data generated following the GeneSippr analysis could be used for isolate identification in place of lengthy biochemical characterization and typing methodologies. Significant advantages of this procedure include ease of adaptation to the detection of any gene marker of interest, as well as to the identification of other foodborne pathogens for which genomic markers have been defined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.