Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25860618›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015

Prospective study of the safety and efficacy of a pancreatic cancer stem cell vaccine.

Mao Lin, Yuan-Ying Yuan, Shu-Peng Liu, Juan-Juan Shi, Xin-An Long, Li-Zhi Niu, Ji-Bing Chen, Qiao Li, Ke-Cheng Xu

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Breaking Immunosuppression to Enhance Cancer Stem Cell-Targeted Immunotherapy.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Role of Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mao LinFuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University School of Medicine, Guangzhou, 510665, China.
Yuan-Ying Yuan
Shu-Peng Liu
Juan-Juan Shi
Xin-An Long
Li-Zhi Niu
Ji-Bing Chen
Qiao Li
Ke-Cheng Xu
Fuda Cancer Hospital · CNJinan University · CNUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn this trial, we isolated and cultured pancreatic cancer stem cells (CSCs) to produce a vaccine and prospectively evaluated its safety and efficacy in low-, medium-, and high-dose groups. MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween February and October 2014, we enrolled 90 patients who met the enrollment criteria and assigned them to three groups (n = 30). CSC-specific and CSC-non-specific immunity pre- and post-vaccination were compared by Dunnett's multiple comparison test (one-way ANOVA). The data are presented as the mean±standard deviation. Local and systemic adverse events were recorded in the nursing records and compared using the Chi-square test. All statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).

resultsThroughout the trial, an injection site reaction was the most common reaction (54 %), and fever was least common (9 %). The incidence of these side effects did not vary among the three groups. When the pre- and post-vaccination immunity was compared, we found that both CSC-nonspecific and CSC-specific responses were significantly increased in the high-dose group.

conclusionThis study is the first clinical trial of a pancreatic CSC vaccine and preliminarily proves its safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansImmunityMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Stem CellsPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesSafetyVaccinationVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID25860618
PMCPMC11823924
OpenAlexW2060348397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.