ArticlePloS one2015
Genetic basis of a cognitive complexity metric.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relational Integration Demands Are Tracked by Temporally Delayed Neural Representations in Alpha and Beta Rhythms Within Higher-Order Cortical Networks.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Discovery of host genetic factors through multi-locus GWAS against toxoplasmosis in sheep: addressing one health perspectives.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Diacylglycerol Kinases and Its Role in Lipid Metabolism and Related Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Genome-wide association study of population-standardised cognitive performance phenotypes in a rural South African community.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Generating distant analogies facilitates relational integration: Intermediary role of relational mindset and cognitive load.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Beyond Lipid Signaling: Pleiotropic Effects of Diacylglycerol Kinases in Cellular Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Individual differences in relational reasoning.Memory & cognition · 2020Article
- Genetics and Learning: How the Genes Influence Educational Attainment.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
- Transcriptomic context ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Associations between maternal cytokine levels during gestation and measures of child cognitive abilities and executive functioning.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2018Article
- Effects of Prenatal Nicotine Exposure on Infant Language Development: A Cohort Follow Up Study.Maternal and child health journal · 2017Article
- A method for integrating neuroimaging into genetic models of learning performance.Genetic epidemiology · 2017Article
- Resolving Conflicts Between Syntax and Plausibility in Sentence Comprehension.Advances in cognitive psychology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relational complexity (RC) is a metric reflecting capacity limitation in relational processing. It plays a crucial role in higher cognitive processes and is an endophenotype for several disorders. However, the genetic underpinnings of complex relational processing have not been investigated. Using the classical twin model, we estimated the heritability of RC and genetic overlap with intelligence (IQ), reasoning, and working memory in a twin and sibling sample aged 15-29 years (N = 787). Further, in an exploratory search for genetic loci contributing to RC, we examined associated genetic markers and genes in our Discovery sample and selected loci for replication in four independent samples (ALSPAC, LBC1936, NTR, NCNG), followed by meta-analysis (N>6500) at the single marker level. Twin modelling showed RC is highly heritable (67%), has considerable genetic overlap with IQ (59%), and is a major component of genetic covariation between reasoning and working memory (72%). At the molecular level, we found preliminary support for four single-marker loci (one in the gene DGKB), and at a gene-based level for the NPS gene, having influence on cognition. These results indicate that genetic sources influencing relational processing are a key component of the genetic architecture of broader cognitive abilities. Further, they suggest a genetic cascade, whereby genetic factors influencing capacity limitation in relational processing have a flow-on effect to more complex cognitive traits, including reasoning and working memory, and ultimately, IQ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.