Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25859943›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2015

Computational prediction of protein-protein interactions.

Tobias Ehrenberger, Lewis C Cantley, Michael B Yaffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Molecular networks in Network Medicine: Development and applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Network Analyses in Plant Pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias EhrenbergerDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Lewis C Cantley
Michael B Yaffe

Funding

Tuberous Sclerosis-Pathway and PathogenesisP01CA120964 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI David J. Kwiatkowski · 2007 to 2026
$35.9M
Modeling human phosphorylation networks through kinome-wide profilingR01GM104047 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TURK, BENJAMIN E, YAFFE, MICHAEL B · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA120964NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of protein-protein interactions and kinase-specific phosphorylation sites on individual proteins is critical for correctly placing proteins within signaling pathways and networks. The importance of this type of annotation continues to increase with the continued explosion of genomic and proteomic data, particularly with emerging data categorizing posttranslational modifications on a large scale. A variety of computational tools are available for this purpose. In this chapter, we review the general methodologies for these types of computational predictions and present a detailed user-focused tutorial of one such method and computational tool, Scansite, which is freely available to the entire scientific community over the Internet.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MapsAlgorithmsAmino Acid MotifsBinding SitesComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinMolecular BiologyPhosphorylationPhosphotransferasesProtein BindingProteinsProteomicsSoftwarePhosphotransferasesProteins

Identifiers

PMID25859943
PMCPMC4435844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.