Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25859851›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Specific marker expression and cell state of Schwann cells during culture in vitro.

Zhangyin Liu, Yu-Qing Jin, Lulu Chen, Yang Wang, Xiaonan Yang, Jia Cheng, Wei Wu, Zuoliang Qi, Zunli Shen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MSCA-Net: Multi-Modal Cell Segmentation for Spatial Transcriptomics.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. GFRα1 Promotes Axon Regeneration after Peripheral Nerve Injury by Functioning as a Ligand.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhangyin LiuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 1st People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Trauma Center, Shanghai 1st People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Qing JinDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 1st People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Trauma Center, Shanghai 1st People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Lulu ChenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 1st People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Trauma Center, Shanghai 1st People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yang WangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 1st People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Trauma Center, Shanghai 1st People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiaonan YangPlastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jia ChengDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wei WuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zuoliang QiPlastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zunli ShenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 1st People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Trauma Center, Shanghai 1st People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schwann cells (SCs) in animals exist in different developmental stages or wound repair phases, distinguished mainly by the expression of SC-specific markers. No study has yet determined SC state under in vitro culture conditions, and the specific markers expressed in SC are obscure as well. In this study, we harvested sciatic nerves from newborn mice and isolated SCs by an enzyme-digestion method, then we examined the expression profiles of ten markers (S100, p75NTR, Sox10, Sox2, GAP43, NCAM, Krox20, Oct6, MBP, and MPZ) at both the RNA and protein levels in in vitro mouse SCs and speculated their relation with in vivo SC stages. We assayed RNA and protein levels of SC specific markers by immunofluorescence, Western Blot, and real-time quantitative RT-PCR. The results show that the expression of most markers (S100, p75NTR, GAP43, NCAM, Krox20, Oct6, MBP and MPZ) was not detectable in all of early stage cultured SCs. The expression of transcription factors Sox10 and Sox2 was, however, detectable in all SCs. After 8 days, the positive expression rate of all markers except GAP43 and Oct6 was almost 100%.These results indicates Sox10 is a necessary marker for SC identification, while S100 is not reliable. SCs cultured in vitro express Sox2, P75NTR, NCAM, GAP43, Oct6, and MPZ, suggesting that they are similar to in vivo undifferentiated iSCs or dedifferentiated iSCs after nerve injury.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiomarkersCells, CulturedGAP-43 ProteinGene Expression ProfilingMiceMyelin Basic ProteinMyelin P0 ProteinNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesPhenotypeReceptor, Nerve Growth FactorS100 ProteinsSchwann CellsSciatic NerveBiomarkersGAP-43 ProteinMbp protein, mouseMpz protein, mouseMyelin Basic ProteinMyelin P0 ProteinNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesReceptor, Nerve Growth FactorS100 ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25859851
PMCPMC4393255
OpenAlexW2019527990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.