Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25859829›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2015

Soft tissue sarcoma and radiation therapy advances, impact on toxicity.

Nancy El-Bared, Philip Wong, Dian Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans.Current treatment options in oncology · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Surgical resection, intraoperative radiotherapy and immediate plastic reconstruction: A good option for the treatment of distal extremity soft tissue sarcomas.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nancy El-BaredDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Philip Wong
Dian Wang
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CARush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementSince adjuvant radiotherapy was introduced in the 1970s for soft tissue sarcoma (STS), sequential clinical trials characterized the toxicities induced by radiotherapy when given post-operatively and pre-operatively. Gradual technological advancements led to more precise radiotherapy delivery through intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and more accurate targeting through image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) to minimize normal tissues from high-dose irradiation. These improvements ultimately reduced the long-term toxicities from radiotherapy. Due to the rarity and complexity of the disease, patients with STS should be treated at institutes where multidisciplinary discussion and care can be provided. Patients with STS should ideally be offered the choice of participating in clinical trials. International phase III trials are ongoing through COG-NRG Oncology (Pazopanib Neoadjuvant Trial in Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas (PAZNTIS)) to define the role of radiotherapy in combination with pazopanib in the clinical care of extremity STS and through EORTC (STRASS) to define the role of pre-operative radiotherapy in the treatment of retroperitoneal STS. Outside of clinical trials, extremity STS should be treated at centers of expertise where high-quality IMRT-IGRT is administered to lessen acute and long-term toxicities. In patients with extremity STS, pre-operative IMRT-IGRT is preferred as better target delineation and image guidance can be achieved. While acute wound complication remains a concern, patients treated using pre-operative IMRT-IGRT are largely spared of severe chronic irreversible radiation-related side effects such as bone fracture, fibrosis, edema, and joint stiffness that alter limb functions. For STS originating from the retroperitoneum, if radiotherapy is recommended following multidisciplinary case discussion, pre-operative radiotherapy is preferred over post-operative radiotherapy. Post-operatively, normal radiosensitive organs fill the surgical cavity, which is the targeted volume of radiotherapy; hence, post-operative radiotherapy for retroperitoneal STS is associated with severe to fatal toxicities. Pre-operative radiotherapy has a more favorable toxicity profile as the retroperitoneal STS displaces, and thus spares, normal structures and organs from the high-dose irradiation volume.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25859829
OpenAlexW2089360403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.