Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25859686›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2015

An Assessment of Participatory Integrated Vector Management for Malaria Control in Kenya.

Clifford Maina Mutero, Charles Mbogo, Joseph Mwangangi, Susan Imbahale, Lydia Kibe, Benedict Orindi, Melaku Girma, Annah Njui, Wilber Lwande, Hippolyte Affognon and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Integrated vector management for malaria control: a review of approaches and effectiveness.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Revisiting an old idea: engineering against vector-borne diseases in the domestic environment.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Modern Vector Control.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Clifford Maina MuteroInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Charles Mbogo
Joseph Mwangangi
Susan Imbahale
Lydia Kibe
Benedict Orindi
Melaku Girma
Annah Njui
Wilber Lwande
Hippolyte Affognon
Charity Gichuki
Wolfgang Richard Mukabana

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends integrated vector management (IVM) as a strategy to improve and sustain malaria vector control. However, this approach has not been widely adopted.

objectivesWe comprehensively assessed experiences and findings on IVM in Kenya with a view to sharing lessons that might promote its wider application.

methodsThe assessment used information from a qualitative external evaluation of two malaria IVM projects implemented between 2006 and 2011 and an analysis of their accumulated entomological and malaria case data. The project sites were Malindi and Nyabondo, located in coastal and western Kenya, respectively. The assessment focused on implementation of five key elements of IVM: integration of vector control methods, evidence-based decision making, intersectoral collaboration, advocacy and social mobilization, and capacity building.

resultsIVM was more successfully implemented in Malindi than in Nyabondo owing to greater community participation and multistakeholder engagement. There was a significant decline in the proportion of malaria cases among children admitted to Malindi Hospital, from 23.7% in 2006 to 10.47% in 2011 (p < 0.001). However, the projects' operational research methodology did not allow statistical attribution of the decline in malaria and malaria vectors to specific IVM interventions or other factors.

conclusionsSustaining IVM is likely to require strong participation and support from multiple actors, including community-based groups, non-governmental organizations, international and national research institutes, and various government ministries. A cluster-randomized controlled trial would be essential to quantify the effectiveness and impact of specific IVM interventions, alone or in combination. CITATION: Mutero CM, Mbogo C, Mwangangi J, Imbahale S, Kibe L, Orindi B, Girma M, Njui A, Lwande W, Affognon H, Gichuki C, Mukabana WR. 2015. An assessment of participatory integrated vector management for malaria control in Kenya. Environ Health Perspect 123:1145-1151; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408748.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationAdolescentAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolConsumer AdvocacyCooperative BehaviorCulicidaeDecision MakingFemaleHumansInfantKenyaMalariaMaleMosquito Control

Identifiers

PMID25859686
PMCPMC4629737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.