Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25859555›Full record

ArticleOncoscience2015

RAS mutations vary between lesions in synchronous primary colorectal cancer: testing only one lesion is not sufficient to guide anti-EGFR treatment decisions.

Mariana Petaccia de Macedo, Fernanda Machado de Melo, Júlia da Silva Ribeiro, Celso Abdon Lopes de Mello, Maria Dirlei Ferreira de Souza Begnami, Fernando Augusto Soares, Dirce Maria Carraro, Isabela Werneck da Cunha

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. IMPACT OF KRAS MUTATIONS IN CLINICAL FEATURES IN COLORECTAL CANCER.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. American journal of cancer research · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariana Petaccia de MacedoDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis, Anatomic Pathology Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil ; Laboratory of Investigative Pathology, CIPE / AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda Machado de MeloDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis, Anatomic Pathology Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Júlia da Silva RibeiroDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis, Anatomic Pathology Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Celso Abdon Lopes de MelloDepartment of Clinical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Dirlei Ferreira de Souza BegnamiDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis, Anatomic Pathology Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil ; Laboratory of Investigative Pathology, CIPE / AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Augusto SoaresDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis, Anatomic Pathology Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil ; Laboratory of Investigative Pathology, CIPE / AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dirce Maria CarraroDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis, Anatomic Pathology Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil ; Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology, CIPE / AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabela Werneck da CunhaDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis, Anatomic Pathology Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil ; Laboratory of Investigative Pathology, CIPE / AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
AC Camargo Hospital · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMutations in KRAS and NRAS genes are negative predictors of anti-EGFR therapies response in metastatic colorectal cancer. There are few reports on RAS testing in synchronous primary colorectal cancer (SP-CRC) and a lack of recommendations on which tissue should be tested for the mutation in this disease. This study analyzed the RAS status of both lesions in SP-CRC patients and in their metastasis. MATERIALS AND

methodsDNA was obtained from formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue, and mutations were analyzed by pyrosequencing.

resultsRAS status was heterogeneous in 6 (75%) of 8 SP-CRC patients between primary lesions. Five showed heterogeneity regarding RAS mutational status, and from these, four presented with metastasis: 3 cases (75%) had WT metastatic tissue, and 1 case (25%) had mutated metastatic tissue. One patient showed divergence regarding RAS mutation type. DISCUSSION: RAS mutations vary significantly between SP-CRC lesions, and the status of the metastasis is unpredictable. Testing for RAS mutations in only 1 of the primary lesions can misguide clinical decisions and hind the predictive potential of anti-EGFR treatment. A more appropriate approach in metastatic SP-CRC is to test the metastatic tissue or both primary lesions for providing more accurate mutation scenery and support more assertive clinical decisions.

Indexed as

anti-EGFR treatmentcolorectal cancerKRASNRASsynchronic primary colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID25859555
PMCPMC4381705
OpenAlexW2187600113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.