Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25859503›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015

Eventful anaesthesia: can we prevent it?

Thrivikrama Padur Tantry, Harish Karanth, Pramal Shetty, Karunakara Kenjar Adappa

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thrivikrama Padur TantryAssociate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences , Kuntikana, Mangalore, India .
Harish KaranthAssistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences , Kuntikana, Mangalore, India .
Pramal ShettySenior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences , Kuntikana, Mangalore, India .
Karunakara Kenjar AdappaProfessor and Head of the Department, Department of Anaesthesiology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences , Kuntikana, Mangalore, India .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To ensure the utmost safety, it is recommended that prior checking the machine and breathing systems as mandatory. Certain factors beyond the control of the anaesthesiologist lead to the operative room incidences jeopardizing the anaesthetised patient which otherwise cannot be prevented by prior custom checking. Delayed occlusion of a spiral reinforced endotracheal tube during prone position anaesthesia and faulty dual control knob of fresh gas flow of an anaesthesia machine leading to inadequate ventilation are given as examples. In above events, a prior checking the machine or tracheal tube, could not prevent its occurrence. However, use of a deputy of the objects resulted in uneventful anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Bi-directional fresh gas flowIncident reportingReinforced endotracheal tubeTube occlusion

Identifiers

PMID25859503
PMCPMC4378785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.