Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25859418›Full record

ArticleIEEE International Workshop on Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics : [proceedings]. IEEE International Workshop on Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics2012

A Bayesian Graphical Model for Integrative Analysis of TCGA Data.

Yanxun Xu, Jie Zhang, Yuan Yuan, Riten Mitra, Peter Müller, Yuan Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE International Workshop on Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics : [proceedings]. IEEE International Workshop on Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yanxun XuDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX, yanxun.xu@rice.edu.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Yuan YuanGraduate Program in Structural and Computational Biology and Molecular Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Riten MitraICES, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Peter MüllerDepartment of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Yuan JiCCRI, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, yji@northshore.org.

Funding

Bayesian models for cancer prognosis by integrating diverse types of dataR01CA132897 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JI, YUAN, MUELLER, PETER · 2008 to 2019
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We integrate three TCGA data sets including measurements on matched DNA copy numbers (C), DNA methylation (M), and mRNA expression (E) over 500+ ovarian cancer samples. The integrative analysis is based on a Bayesian graphical model treating the three types of measurements as three vertices in a network. The graph is used as a convenient way to parameterize and display the dependence structure. Edges connecting vertices infer specific types of regulatory relationships. For example, an edge between M and E and a lack of edge between C and E implies methylation-controlled transcription, which is robust to copy number changes. In other words, the mRNA expression is sensitive to methylational variation but not copy number variation. We apply the graphical model to each of the genes in the TCGA data independently and provide a comprehensive list of inferred profiles. Examples are provided based on simulated data as well.

Identifiers

PMID25859418
PMCPMC4387199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.