Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25859191›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2015

Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training-a systematic review.

Anneli Wall, Jörgen Borg, Susanne Palmcrantz

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02545088 nacompletednot on this map

New Technology for Individualised, Intensive Training of Gait After Stroke- Phase II Trials, Study II

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanderyd HospitalRan2015 to 2019Enrolled48ConditionsStroke, Ambulation Difficulty, HemiparesisArmsHybrid Assistive Limb (HAL), 1st control group, 2nd control group
NCT02545205 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

New Technology for Individualised, Intensive Training of Gait After Stroke- Phase II Trials, Study I

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanderyd HospitalRan2018 to 2018Enrolled2ConditionsStroke, Ambulation Difficulty, HemiparesisArmsHybrid Assistive Limb (HAL), Conventional gait training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Robot-assisted gait training in stroke.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anneli WallDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden.
Jörgen BorgDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanne PalmcrantzDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden.
Danderyds sjukhus · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to review the literature on clinical applications of the Hybrid Assistive Limb system for gait training.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL and clinicaltrials.gov and additional search was made using reference lists in identified reports. Abstracts were screened, relevant articles were reviewed and subject to quality assessment.

resultsOut of 37 studies, 7 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. Six studies were single group studies and 1 was an explorative randomized controlled trial. In total, these studies involved 140 participants of whom 118 completed the interventions and 107 used HAL for gait training. Five studies concerned gait training after stroke, 1 after spinal cord injury (SCI) and 1 study after stroke, SCI or other diseases affecting walking ability. Minor and transient side effects occurred but no serious adverse events were reported in the studies. Beneficial effects on gait function variables and independence in walking were observed.

conclusionsThe accumulated findings demonstrate that the HAL system is feasible when used for gait training of patients with lower extremity paresis in a professional setting. Beneficial effects on gait function and independence in walking were observed but data do not allow conclusions. Further controlled studies are recommended.

Indexed as

gaitgait machinelocomotionparesisrehabilitationreviewroboticswalking

Identifiers

PMID25859191
PMCPMC4373251
OpenAlexW2010239598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.