Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25858909›Full record

Trial reportThorax2015

A randomised controlled trial of small particle inhaled steroids in refractory eosinophilic asthma (SPIRA).

David Hodgson, John Anderson, Catherine Reynolds, Garry Meakin, Helen Bailey, Ian Pavord, Dominick Shaw, Tim Harrison

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01171365 (Small Particle Inhaled Steroids in Refractory Steroid-responsive Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01171365 phase4completednot on this map

Small Particle Inhaled Steroids in Refractory Steroid-responsive Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2010 to 2013Enrolled30ConditionsAsthmaArmsCiclesonide, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David HodgsonNottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
John AndersonNottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Catherine ReynoldsNottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Garry MeakinNottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Helen BaileyNottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ian PavordNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Dominick ShawNottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tim HarrisonNottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0909-20101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome patients with refractory asthma have evidence of uncontrolled eosinophilic inflammation in the distal airways. While traditional formulations of inhaled steroids settle predominantly in the large airways, newer formulations with an extra-fine particle size have a more peripheral pattern of deposition. Specifically treating distal airway inflammation may improve asthma control.

methods30 patients with refractory asthma despite high dose inhaled corticosteroids were identified as having persistent airway eosinophilia. Following 2 weeks of prednisolone 30 mg, patients demonstrating an improvement in asthma control were randomised to receive either ciclesonide 320 µg twice daily or placebo in addition to usual maintenance therapy for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was sputum eosinophil count at week 8. Alveolar nitric oxide was measured as a marker of distal airway inflammation.

resultsThere was continued suppression of differential sputum eosinophil counts with ciclesonide (median 2.3%) but not placebo (median 4.5%) though the between-group difference was not significant. When patients who had changed their maintenance prednisolone dose during the trial were excluded the difference between groups was significant (1.4% vs 4.5%, p=0.028). Though alveolar nitric oxide decreased with ciclesonide the value did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionsThese data demonstrate that patients with ongoing eosinophilic inflammation are not truly refractory, and that suppression of airway eosinophilia may be maintained with additional inhaled corticosteroid. Further work is needed with a focus on patient-orientated outcome measures such as exacerbation rate, with additional tests of small airway function. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01171365. Protocol available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdministration, InhalationAdultAgedAsthmaDrug ResistanceFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitric OxidePilot ProjectsPrednisonePregnenedionesPulmonary AlveoliciclesonideGlucocorticoidsNitric OxidePrednisonePregnenedionesAsthmaInhaler devicesPulmonary eosinophilia

Identifiers

PMID25858909
PMCPMC4453493
OpenAlexW2139701326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.