Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25858860›Full record

ReviewVaccine2015

Systems vaccinology: Enabling rational vaccine design with systems biological approaches.

Thomas Hagan, Helder I Nakaya, Shankar Subramaniam, Bali Pulendran

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Immunogenicity ofVaccines · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas HaganDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Helder I NakayaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Pathology, Emory Vaccine Center, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Shankar SubramaniamDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Department of Nanoengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Bali PulendranDepartment of Pathology, Emory Vaccine Center, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: bpulend@emory.edu.
Emory National Primate Research CenterUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Systems Biological Analysis of Innate and Adaptive Responses to VaccinationU19AI090023 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AHMED, RAFI, LI, SHUZHAO · 2010 to 2021
$45.0M
Understanding the Role of Mucosal Antigen Presenting Cells in Regulating Immune ResponseR37AI048638 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PULENDRAN, BALI · 2009 to 2018
$4.0M
Emory R38 Research Training ProgramR38AI140299 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI OFOTOKUN, IGHOVWERHA, ROUPHAEL, NADINE GEORGES · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
Microbes, Dendritic Cell Subsets and T-Cell ImmunityR56AI048638 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI PULENDRAN, BALI · 2008 to 2008
$440k
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI048638NIAID NIH HHS R38 AI140299NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI048638NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines have drastically reduced the mortality and morbidity of many diseases. However, vaccines have historically been developed empirically, and recent development of vaccines against current pandemics such as HIV and malaria has been met with difficulty. The advent of high-throughput technologies, coupled with systems biological methods of data analysis, has enabled researchers to interrogate the entire complement of a variety of molecular components within cells, and characterize the myriad interactions among them in order to model and understand the behavior of the system as a whole. In the context of vaccinology, these tools permit exploration of the molecular mechanisms by which vaccines induce protective immune responses. Here we review the recent advances, challenges, and potential of systems biological approaches in vaccinology. If the challenges facing this developing field can be overcome, systems vaccinology promises to empower the identification of early predictive signatures of vaccine response, as well as novel and robust correlates of protection from infection. Such discoveries, along with the improved understanding of immune responses to vaccination they impart, will play an instrumental role in development of the next generation of rationally designed vaccines.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsDatasets as TopicHumansSystems BiologyVaccinationVaccinesVaccinesSystems biologySystems vaccinologyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID25858860
PMCPMC4581890
OpenAlexW2019744199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.