Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25858677›Full record

ArticleContraception2015

Pharmacy claims data versus patient self-report to measure contraceptive method continuation.

Jourdan E Triebwasser, Stephanie Higgins, Gina M Secura, Qiuhong Zhao, Jeffrey F Peipert

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jourdan E TriebwasserWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Clinical Research, 660 South Euclid Avenue Campus Box 8064, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. Electronic address: triebwasserj@wudosis.wustl.edu.
Stephanie HigginsWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Clinical Research, 660 South Euclid Avenue Campus Box 8064, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. Electronic address: higginss@wusm.wustl.edu.
Gina M SecuraWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Clinical Research, 660 South Euclid Avenue Campus Box 8064, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Qiuhong ZhaoWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Clinical Research, 660 South Euclid Avenue Campus Box 8064, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. Electronic address: zhaoq@wudosis.wustl.edu.
Jeffrey F PeipertWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Clinical Research, 660 South Euclid Avenue Campus Box 8064, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. Electronic address: peipertj@wudosis.wustl.edu.

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare self-reported 12-month continuation of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), patch, and ring versus continuation by pharmacy claims data. STUDY

designWomen in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project who chose OCPs, the patch, or the ring as their initial method were included. Continuation was assessed by periodic telephone survey and by obtaining prescription claims data. Continuation was defined as no gap of more than 30 days. Kaplan-Meier survival functions were used to estimate continuation rates and cumulative unintended pregnancy rates. Kappa statistic assessed the level of agreement between self-report and claims data.

resultsWe analyzed 1510 women who initiated use by 3 months and provided information on discontinuation. Of OCP users, 59% continued their method at 12 months by self-report versus 38% by pharmacy claims. Patch and ring users had self-reported/pharmacy continuation of 45%/28% and 57%/37%, respectively. Kappa coefficients and their 95% confidence intervals between the two measurements were 0.46 (0.40, 0.52), 0.54 (0.39, 0.68), and 0.54 (0.47, 0.61) for OCP, patch, and ring, respectively. Among women who self-reported continuation, unintended pregnancy rates were 0.4% in those who continued by pharmacy claims versus 4.9% in those who discontinued according to claims data.

conclusionContraceptive continuation rates differ by self-report versus pharmacy claims with women overestimating their continuation by self-report. IMPLICATIONS: This article directly compares contraception continuation rates by self-report and by pharmacy claims data. The study suggests that previously reported continuation rates from survey data overestimate specific method use.

Indexed as

Self ReportAdultContraceptionContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralData AccuracyFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimatePatient CompliancePharmaciesPregnancyPregnancy RateTransdermal PatchYoung AdultContraceptives, OralContraceptive continuationContraceptive patchContraceptive ringOral contraceptive pillPharmacy claims

Identifiers

PMID25858677
PMCPMC4687894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.