ArticleContraception2015
Pharmacy claims data versus patient self-report to measure contraceptive method continuation.
Article in Contraception, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Prescribed hormonal contraceptive use trends in the Estonian Biobank: A longitudinal observational study.PLoS medicine · 2026Observational
- How have changes in accessibility and public funding influenced contraceptive use among Norwegian adolescents? A cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Fertility treatment and oral contraceptive discontinuation for identification of pregnancy planning in routinely collected health data - an application to analgesic and antibiotic utilisation.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Do Norwegian providers comply with national recommendations when prescribing combined oral contraceptives to starters? A cohort study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Ecological study on the use of hormonal contraception, abortions and births among teenagers in the Nordic countries.BMJ open · 2018Article
- The Relationship Between Prescription Copayments and Contraceptive Adherence in a New-user Cohort.Medical care · 2018Article
- Misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants.Contraception · 2018Article
- Measuring oral contraceptive adherence using self-report versus pharmacy claims data.Contraception · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare self-reported 12-month continuation of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), patch, and ring versus continuation by pharmacy claims data. STUDY
designWomen in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project who chose OCPs, the patch, or the ring as their initial method were included. Continuation was assessed by periodic telephone survey and by obtaining prescription claims data. Continuation was defined as no gap of more than 30 days. Kaplan-Meier survival functions were used to estimate continuation rates and cumulative unintended pregnancy rates. Kappa statistic assessed the level of agreement between self-report and claims data.
resultsWe analyzed 1510 women who initiated use by 3 months and provided information on discontinuation. Of OCP users, 59% continued their method at 12 months by self-report versus 38% by pharmacy claims. Patch and ring users had self-reported/pharmacy continuation of 45%/28% and 57%/37%, respectively. Kappa coefficients and their 95% confidence intervals between the two measurements were 0.46 (0.40, 0.52), 0.54 (0.39, 0.68), and 0.54 (0.47, 0.61) for OCP, patch, and ring, respectively. Among women who self-reported continuation, unintended pregnancy rates were 0.4% in those who continued by pharmacy claims versus 4.9% in those who discontinued according to claims data.
conclusionContraceptive continuation rates differ by self-report versus pharmacy claims with women overestimating their continuation by self-report. IMPLICATIONS: This article directly compares contraception continuation rates by self-report and by pharmacy claims data. The study suggests that previously reported continuation rates from survey data overestimate specific method use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.