Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25858596›Full record

ArticleACS nano2015

Biodegradable nanoneedles for localized delivery of nanoparticles in vivo: exploring the biointerface.

Ciro Chiappini, Jonathan O Martinez, Enrica De Rosa, Carina S Almeida, Ennio Tasciotti, Molly M Stevens

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Poking Pluripotency: Nanoinjection Into Human iPSCs.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Recent advances in single-cell subcellular sampling.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ciro ChiappiniDepartment of Materials, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Jonathan O MartinezDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Enrica De RosaDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Carina S AlmeidaDepartment of Materials, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Ennio Tasciotti *Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Molly M Stevens *Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Houston Methodist · USImperial College London · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Leukocyte Membrane Cloaked Carriers to Target and Overcome Tumor VasculatureR21CA173579 · NCI · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI TASCIOTTI, ENNIO · 2013 to 2014
$371k
Stem Cell-Directed Nanotheranostics for Cancer InterventionF31CA154119 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MARTINEZ, JONATHAN OTTO · 2011 to 2014
$64k
European Research Council 616417NCI NIH HHS 5F31CA154119-02NCI NIH HHS F31 CA154119NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R21 CA173579Wellcome Trust 098411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoneedles display potential in mediating the delivery of drugs and biologicals, as well as intracellular sensing and single-cell stimulation, through direct access to the cell cytoplasm. Nanoneedles enable cytosolic delivery, negotiating the cell membrane and the endolysosomal system, thus overcoming these major obstacles to the efficacy of nanotherapeutics. The low toxicity and minimal invasiveness of nanoneedles have a potential for the sustained nonimmunogenic delivery of payloads in vivo, provided that the development of biocompatible nanoneedles with a simple deployment strategy is achieved. Here we present a mesoporous silicon nanoneedle array that achieves a tight interface with the cell, rapidly negotiating local biological barriers to grant temporary access to the cytosol with minimal impact on cell viability. The tightness of this interfacing enables both delivery of cell-impermeant quantum dots in vivo and live intracellular sensing of pH. Dissecting the biointerface over time elucidated the dynamics of cell association and nanoneedle biodegradation, showing rapid interfacing leading to cytosolic payload delivery within less than 30 minutes in vitro. The rapid and simple application of nanoneedles in vivo to the surface of tissues with different architectures invariably resulted in the localized delivery of quantum dots to the superficial cells and their prolonged retention. This investigation provides an understanding of the dynamics of nanoneedles' biointerface and delivery, outlining a strategy for highly local intracellular delivery of nanoparticles and cell-impermeant payloads within live tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell SurvivalCytosolDrug CarriersHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInjectionsKineticsMaleMiceMusclesNanoparticlesPorosityQuantum DotsSilicon DioxideSkinDrug CarriersSilicon Dioxidebiointerfacedrug deliverynanomedicinenanoneedlespH sensingporous siliconquantum dots

Identifiers

PMID25858596
PMCPMC4733661
OpenAlexW1991498992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.