Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25858289›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2015

Indoor tanning and the MC1R genotype: risk prediction for basal cell carcinoma risk in young people.

Annette M Molinaro, Leah M Ferrucci, Brenda Cartmel, Erikka Loftfield, David J Leffell, Allen E Bale, Susan T Mayne

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Personalized treatment concepts in extraocular cancer.Advances in ophthalmology practice and research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annette M Molinaro
Leah M Ferrucci
Brenda Cartmel
Erikka Loftfield
David J Leffell
Allen E Bale
Susan T Mayne
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

YALE UNIVERSITY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD PROGRAMUL1RR024139 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2006 to 2011
$56.8M
Yale SPORE in Skin CancerP50CA121974 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID F STERN · 2006 to 2026
$43.9M
Novel Tree-based Statistical Methods for Cancer Risk PredictionR01CA163687 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MOLINARO, ANNETTE M · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
Epidemiology, genetics, and behaviors in a study of basal cell carcinomaF32CA144335 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FERRUCCI, LEAH MCARTHUR · 2010 to 2012
$115k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA144335NCI NIH HHS P50 CA121974NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163687NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) incidence is increasing, particularly in young people, and can be associated with significant morbidity and treatment costs. To identify young individuals at risk of BCC, we assessed existing melanoma or overall skin cancer risk prediction models and built a novel risk prediction model, with a focus on indoor tanning and the melanocortin 1 receptor gene, MC1R. We evaluated logistic regression models among 759 non-Hispanic whites from a case-control study of patients seen between 2006 and 2010 in New Haven, Connecticut. In our data, the adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for a model by Han et al. (Int J Cancer. 2006;119(8):1976-1984) with 7 MC1R variants was 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66, 0.78), while that by Smith et al. (J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(15 suppl):8574) with MC1R and indoor tanning had an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.75). Our base model had greater predictive ability than existing models and was significantly improved when we added ever-indoor tanning, burns from indoor tanning, and MC1R (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.81). Our early-onset BCC risk prediction model incorporating MC1R and indoor tanning extends the work of other skin cancer risk prediction models, emphasizes the value of both genotype and indoor tanning in skin cancer risk prediction in young people, and should be validated with an independent cohort.

Indexed as

SunbathingAdultAge FactorsBasal Cell CarcinomaCase-Control StudiesConnecticutEducational StatusFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansLogistic ModelsMalePigmentationReceptor, Melanocortin, Type 1Risk AssessmentReceptor, Melanocortin, Type 1basal cell carcinomaindoor tanningMC1Rmelanocortin 1 receptornonmelanoma skin cancerrisk prediction modelyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID25858289
PMCPMC4445390
OpenAlexW2158372842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.