ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2015
Mutational status of naevus-associated melanomas.
Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histopathological Differences Between De Novo and Nevus-Associated Melanoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Genetic Evolution of Melanoma: Comparative Analysis of Candidate Gene Mutations in Healthy Skin, Nevi, and Tumors from the Same Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Nevus-Associated and De Novo Melanoma: A Cross-Sectional Study on Prognostic Differences.Cancers · 2025Article
- Genetic Landscape of Familial Melanoma.Genes · 2025Review
- Nevi and Melanoma.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Nevus-associated Lentigo Maligna and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma, Clinicopathological Features.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024Article
- Review
- Malignant melanoma: evolving practice management in an era of increasingly effective systemic therapies.Current problems in surgery · 2022Review
- Rejection of benign melanocytic nevi by nevus-resident CD4Science advances · 2021Article
- Novel insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of NRAS mutant melanoma.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2021Article
- The tumor genetics of acral melanoma: What should a dermatologist know?JAAD international · 2020Article
- Does the gene matter? Genotype-phenotype and genotype-outcome associations in congenital melanocytic naevi.The British journal of dermatology · 2020Article
- Identification, Validation, and Functional Annotations of Genome-Wide Profile Variation between Melanocytic Nevus and Malignant Melanoma.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Non-BRAF Mutant Melanoma: Molecular Features and Therapeutical Implications.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Review
- Review
- Molecular Pathways in Melanomagenesis: What We Learned from Next-Generation Sequencing Approaches.Current oncology reports · 2018Review
- Review
- Reflectance confocal microscopy features of BRAF V600E mutated thin melanomas detected by immunohistochemistry.PloS one · 2017Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe origin of melanoma has always been a debated subject, as well as the role of adjacent melanocytic naevi. Epidemiological and histopathological studies point to melanomas arising either de novo or from a naevus.
objectivesTo evaluate the presence of mutations in genes from well-known melanomagenesis pathways in a large series of naevus-associated melanomas. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty-one melanomas found in association with a pre-existing naevus were microdissected, after careful selection of cell subpopulations, and submitted to Sanger sequencing of the BRAF, NRAS, c-KIT, PPP6C, STK19 and RAC1 genes. Each gene was evaluated twice in all samples by sequencing or by sequencing and another confirmation method, allele-specific fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and capillary electrophoresis detection or by SNaPshot analysis. Only mutations confirmed via two different molecular methods or twice by sequencing were considered positive.
resultsThe majority of cases presented concordance of mutational status between melanoma and the associated naevus for all six genes (40 of 60; 66.7%). Nine cases presented concomitant BRAF and NRAS mutations, including one case in which both the melanoma and the adjacent naevus harboured V600E and Q61K double mutations. In two cases, both melanoma and associated naevus located on acral sites were BRAF mutated, including an acral lentiginous melanoma.
conclusionsTo our knowledge this is the largest naevus-associated melanoma series evaluated molecularly. The majority of melanomas and adjacent naevi in our sample share the same mutational profile, corroborating the theory that the adjacent naevus and melanoma are clonally related and that the melanoma originated within a naevus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.