Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25857605›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2015

Multi-omic signature of body weight change: results from a population-based cohort study.

Simone Wahl, Susanne Vogt, Ferdinand Stückler, Jan Krumsiek, Jörg Bartel, Tim Kacprowski, Katharina Schramm, Maren Carstensen, Wolfgang Rathmann, Michael Roden and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Simone Wahl
Susanne Vogt
Ferdinand Stückler
Jan Krumsiek
Jörg Bartel
Tim Kacprowski
Katharina Schramm
Maren Carstensen
Wolfgang Rathmann
Michael Roden
Carolin Jourdan
Antti J Kangas
Pasi Soininen
Mika Ala-Korpela
Ute Nöthlings
Heiner Boeing
Fabian J Theis
Christa Meisinger
Melanie Waldenberger
Karsten Suhre
Georg Homuth
Christian Gieger
Gabi Kastenmüller
Thomas Illig
Jakob Linseisen
Annette Peters
Holger Prokisch
Christian Herder
Barbara Thorand
Harald Grallert
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEDeutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. · DEUniversität Greifswald · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DEGerman Institute of Human Nutrition · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEOulu University Hospital · FITechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcess body weight is a major risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases. The complex molecular mechanisms of body weight change-induced metabolic perturbations are not fully understood. Specifically, in-depth molecular characterization of long-term body weight change in the general population is lacking. Here, we pursued a multi-omic approach to comprehensively study metabolic consequences of body weight change during a seven-year follow-up in a large prospective study.

methodsWe used data from the population-based Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg (KORA) S4/F4 cohort. At follow-up (F4), two-platform serum metabolomics and whole blood gene expression measurements were obtained for 1,631 and 689 participants, respectively. Using weighted correlation network analysis, omics data were clustered into modules of closely connected molecules, followed by the formation of a partial correlation network from the modules. Association of the omics modules with previous annual percentage weight change was then determined using linear models. In addition, we performed pathway enrichment analyses, stability analyses, and assessed the relation of the omics modules with clinical traits.

resultsFour metabolite and two gene expression modules were significantly and stably associated with body weight change (P-values ranging from 1.9 × 10(-4) to 1.2 × 10(-24)). The four metabolite modules covered major branches of metabolism, with VLDL, LDL and large HDL subclasses, triglycerides, branched-chain amino acids and markers of energy metabolism among the main representative molecules. One gene expression module suggests a role of weight change in red blood cell development. The other gene expression module largely overlaps with the lipid-leukocyte (LL) module previously reported to interact with serum metabolites, for which we identify additional co-expressed genes. The omics modules were interrelated and showed cross-sectional associations with clinical traits. Moreover, weight gain and weight loss showed largely opposing associations with the omics modules.

conclusionsLong-term weight change in the general population globally associates with serum metabolite concentrations. An integrated metabolomics and transcriptomics approach improved the understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying the association of weight gain with changes in lipid and amino acid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, mitochondrial function as well as blood cell development and function.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGene ExpressionGene Regulatory NetworksHumansLinear ModelsMetabolomeMetabolomicsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID25857605
PMCPMC4367822
OpenAlexW1974770153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.