Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25857209›Full record

SynthesisTransfusion2015

Role of granulocyte transfusions in invasive fusariosis: systematic review and single-center experience.

Sameer S Kadri, Kenneth E Remy, Jeffrey R Strich, Juan Gea-Banacloche, Susan F Leitman

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transfusion, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Invasive fusariosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Invasive Fusariosis in Patients with Hematologic Diseases.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Scedosporiosis and Fusariosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Necrotizing fungal gingivitis in a patient with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: visible yet obscure.Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, medicine, and pathology · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sameer S KadriDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health.
Kenneth E RemyDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health.
Jeffrey R StrichDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar-Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Juan Gea-BanaclocheNational Cancer Institute, Experimental Transplantation and Immunology Branch, National Institutes of Health.
Susan F LeitmanDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institutes of Health · USMedStar Georgetown University Hospital · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive Fusarium infection is relatively refractory to available antifungal agents. Invasive fusariosis (IF) occurs almost exclusively in the setting of profound neutropenia and/or systemic corticosteroid use. Treatment guidelines for IF are not well established, including the role of granulocyte transfusions (GTs) to counter neutropenia. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted a systematic review, identifying IF cases where GTs were used as adjunctive therapy to antifungal agents and also report a single-center case series detailing our experience (1996-2012) of all IF cases treated with antifungal agents and GTs. In the systematic review cases, GTs were predominantly collected from nonstimulated donors whereas, in the case series, they were universally derived from dexamethasone- and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-stimulated donors.

resultsTwenty-three patients met inclusion criteria for the systematic review and 11 for the case series. Response rates after GTs were 30 and 91% in the review and case series, respectively. Survival to hospital discharge remained low at 30 and 45%, respectively. Ten patients in the systematic review and three in the case series failed to achieve hematopoietic recovery and none of these survived. In the case series, donor-stimulated GTs generated mean "same-day" neutrophil increments of 3.35 × 10(9)  ± 1.24 × 10(9) /L and mean overall posttransfusion neutrophil increments of 2.46 × 10(9)  ± 0.85 × 10(9) /L. Progressive decrements in neutrophil response to GTs in two cases were attributed to GT-related HLA alloimmunization.

conclusionIn patients with IF, donor-stimulated GTs may contribute to high response rates by effectively bridging periods of neutropenia or marrow suppression. However, their utility in the absence of neutrophil recovery remains questionable.

Indexed as

FemaleFusariosisGranulocytesHumansLeukocyte TransfusionMale

Identifiers

PMID25857209
PMCPMC4573241
OpenAlexW1863891734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.