Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25856494›Full record

ReviewNeuron2015

Moving stem cells to the clinic: potential and limitations for brain repair.

Julius A Steinbeck, Lorenz Studer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Ties That Bind: Glial Transplantation in White Matter Ischemia and Vascular Dementia.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cell reports methods · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julius A SteinbeckThe Center for Stem Cell Biology, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; Developmental Biology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Lorenz StuderThe Center for Stem Cell Biology, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; Developmental Biology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: studerl@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Human embryonic stem cell derived midbrain dopamine neuronsR01NS052671 · NINDS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI STUDER, LORENZ P. · 2007 to 2010
$1.6M
Tools towards the rapid derivation of glial cells from human pluripotent cellsR21NS084334 · NINDS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI STUDER, LORENZ P. · 2013 to 2014
$484k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NINDS NIH HHS NS052671NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052671NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS084334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell-based therapies hold considerable promise for many currently devastating neurological disorders. Substantial progress has been made in the derivation of disease-relevant human donor cell populations. Behavioral data in relevant animal models of disease have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy for several cell-based approaches. Consequently, cGMP grade cell products are currently being developed for first in human clinical trials in select disorders. Despite the therapeutic promise, the presumed mechanism of action of donor cell populations often remains insufficiently validated. It depends greatly on the properties of the transplanted cell type and the underlying host pathology. Several new technologies have become available to probe mechanisms of action in real time and to manipulate in vivo cell function and integration to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Results from such studies generate crucial insight into the nature of brain repair that can be achieved today and push the boundaries of what may be possible in the future.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesHumansStem CellsStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID25856494
PMCPMC4443446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.