ArticleTransplantation2015
Murine Fibroblastic Reticular Cells From Lymph Node Interact With CD4+ T Cells Through CD40-CD40L.
Article in Transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- CXCL12+ fibroblastic reticular cells in lymph nodes facilitate immune tolerance by regulating T cell-mediated alloimmunity.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- The aging of the immune system and its implications for transplantation.GeroScience · 2023Review
- Compartmentalized multicellular crosstalk in lymph nodes coordinates the generation of potent cellular and humoral immune responses.European journal of immunology · 2021Review
- Lymph node fibroblastic reticular cells steer immune responses.Trends in immunology · 2021Review
- Lymph node fibroblastic reticular cells deposit fibrosis-associated collagen following organ transplantation.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2020Article
- Role of lymph node stroma and microenvironment in T cell tolerance.Immunological reviews · 2019Review
- Differential Regulation of T-cell Immunity and Tolerance by Stromal Laminin Expressed in the Lymph Node.Transplantation · 2019Article
- Gut microbiota-dependent modulation of innate immunity and lymph node remodeling affects cardiac allograft outcomes.JCI insight · 2018Article
- Mesenteric lymph node stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles contribute to peripheral de novo induction of Foxp3European journal of immunology · 2017Article
- Challenges and opportunities in targeting the CD28/CTLA-4 pathway in transplantation and autoimmunity.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2017Review
- IL-10 from marginal zone precursor B cells controls the differentiation of Th17, Tfh and Tfr cells in transplantation tolerance.Immunology letters · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCostimulatory blockade with anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody (mAb) plus donor-specific splenocyte transfusion (DST) induces alloantigen-specific tolerance. We previously showed that lymphotoxin signaling in the fibroblastic reticular cell (FRC) stromal subset was required for proper lymph node structure and function during tolerization in murine cardiac transplantation. Here we focused on FRC functions and hypothesized that DST and anti-CD40L mAb-modulated FRC interactions with CD4(+) T cells in mice.
methodsMice were immunized or tolerized by DST or DST plus anti-CD40L mAb. Fibroblastic reticular cells were flow-sorted at different timepoints for characterization and in vitro proliferation and activation assays.
resultsFibroblastic reticular cells responded rapidly to DST by transcribing inflammatory cytokine and chemokine messenger RNAs, such as CXCL2, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CCL21. Conversely, anti-CD40L mAb inhibited FRC inflammatory responses. CD40 was expressed on FRC and agonistic anti-CD40 mAb activated FRC, which supported CD4(+) T-cell proliferation, whereas unstimulated FRC did not. Anti-CD3 mAb-activated CD4(+) T cells induced inflammatory cytokine and chemokine expressions by FRC, which were inhibited by anti-CD40L mAb. Thus, FRC phenotype was altered by interaction with CD4(+) T cells through CD40-CD40L, and activated FRC interacted directly with CD4(+) T cells to support T cell activation and proliferation in vitro.
conclusionsTaken together, these results demonstrated that CD40 on FRC facilitated bidirectional communication between FRC and CD4(+) T cells via CD40-CD40L, thereby altering FRC gene expression of immune regulatory molecules. Because blockade of CD40-CD40L interactions results in tolerance in mice, identification of FRC-T cell interactions provides a new research target for tolerance induction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.