ArticlePloS one2015
Comparative genome analyses of Serratia marcescens FS14 reveals its high antagonistic potential.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome sequence of the endophytic biocontrol and plant growth-promotingMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Whole Genome Analysis of Propiconazole-Degrading Serratia marcescens BM-Q: A Rhizobacterium.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Genomic and phenotypic insights into Serratia interaction with plants from an ecological perspective.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025Article
- Genome-resolved analysis of Serratia marcescens strain SMTT infers niche specialization as a hydrocarbon-degrader.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024Article
- An up-to-date review of biomedical applications of serratiopeptidase and its biobetter derivatives as a multi-potential metalloprotease.Archives of microbiology · 2024Review
- Antibacterial Properties of Bacteriocin Purified from Serratia marcescens and Computerized Assessment of its Interaction with Antigen 43 in Escherichia coli.Archives of Razi Institute · 2023Article
- Inhibition of Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria by Excreted Metabolites ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- The man, the plant, and the insect: shooting host specificity determinants inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Genetic Determinants of Antagonistic Interactions and the Response of New Endophytic StrainInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Histometric and morphological damage caused by Serratia marcescens to the tick Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae).Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Crystal structures of PigF, anIUCrJ · 2022Article
- RpoS Activates the Prodigionsin Production by Activating the Transcription of the RpoS-DependentIndian journal of microbiology · 2021Article
- Characterization of a strain of Serratia sp. with ixodicide activity against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.Experimental & applied acarology · 2021Article
- Biotechnological Activities and Applications of Bacterial Pigments Violacein and Prodigiosin.Journal of biological engineering · 2021Review
- Complete Genome Sequences of One Prodigiosin-ProducingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Genome Sequences ofBiology · 2020Article
- Mechanism of interaction of an endofungal bacterium Serratia marcescens D1 with its host and non-host fungi.PloS one · 2020Article
- Complete Genome Sequence of Serratia marcescens Myophage Moabite.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019Article
- Blowing epithelial cell bubbles with GumB: ShlA-family pore-forming toxins induce blebbing and rapid cellular death in corneal epithelial cells.PLoS pathogens · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
S. marcescens FS14 was isolated from an Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz plant that was infected by Fusarium oxysporum and showed symptoms of root rot. With the completion of the genome sequence of FS14, the first comprehensive comparative-genomic analysis of the Serratia genus was performed. Pan-genome and COG analyses showed that the majority of the conserved core genes are involved in basic cellular functions, while genomic factors such as prophages contribute considerably to genome diversity. Additionally, a Type I restriction-modification system, a Type III secretion system and tellurium resistance genes are found in only some Serratia species. Comparative analysis further identified that S. marcescens FS14 possesses multiple mechanisms for antagonism against other microorganisms, including the production of prodigiosin, bacteriocins, and multi-antibiotic resistant determinants as well as chitinases. The presence of two evolutionarily distinct Type VI secretion systems (T6SSs) in FS14 may provide further competitive advantages for FS14 against other microbes. To our knowledge, this is the first report of comparative analysis on T6SSs in the genus, which identifies four types of T6SSs in Serratia spp.. Competition bioassays of FS14 against the vital plant pathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum and fungi Fusarium oxysporum and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum were performed to support our genomic analyses, in which FS14 demonstrated high antagonistic activities against both bacterial and fungal phytopathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.