Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25856113›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2015

The Effect of Timing of Concurrent Chemoradiation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

Seunggu J Han, W Caleb Rutledge, Annette M Molinaro, Susan M Chang, Jennifer L Clarke, Michael D Prados, Jennie W Taylor, Mitchel S Berger, Nicholas A Butowski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seunggu J HanDepartments of *Neurological Surgery, ‡Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and §Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
W Caleb Rutledge
Annette M Molinaro
Susan M Chang
Jennifer L Clarke
Michael D Prados
Jennie W Taylor
Mitchel S Berger
Nicholas A Butowski
Neurological Surgery · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Novel Tree-based Statistical Methods for Cancer Risk PredictionR01CA163687 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MOLINARO, ANNETTE M · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of timing of initiation of concurrent radiation and chemotherapy after surgery on outcome of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains unclear.

objectiveTo further explore this issue, we analyzed 4 clinical trials for patients newly diagnosed with GBM receiving concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide.

methodsThe cohort study included 198 adult patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial GBM who were enrolled from 2004 to 2010 in 4 clinical trials consisting of radiation plus temozolomide and an experimental agent. The interval to initiation of therapy was determined from the time of surgical resection. The partitioning deletion/substitution/addition algorithm was used to determine the cutoff points for timing of chemoradiation at which there was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsThe median wait time between surgery and initiation of concurrent chemoradiation was 29.5 days (range, 7-56 days). A short delay in chemoradiation administration (at 30-34 days) was predictive of prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.63, P = .03) and prolonged PFS (HR: 0.68, P = .06) compared with early initiation of concurrent chemoradiation (<30 days), after adjusting for protocol and baseline prognostic variables including extent of resection by multivariate analysis. A longer delay to chemoradiation beyond 34 days was not associated with improved OS or PFS compared with early initiation (HR: 0.94, P = .77 and HR: 0.91, P = .63, respectively).

conclusionA short delay in the start of concurrent chemoradiation is beyond the classic paradigm of 4 weeks post-resection and may be associated with prolonged OS and PFS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesDacarbazineDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID25856113
PMCPMC4506198
OpenAlexW2067008485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.