ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2015
Venous thromboprophylaxis in gastrointestinal bleeding.
Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel risk score to predict deep vein thrombosis after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- The pathophysiology of defective proteostasis in the hypothalamus - from obesity to ageing.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and the incidence of thrombotic events in patients with acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.
methodsIndividuals admitted with a primary diagnosis of a GI bleed along with any endoscopically confirmed source (over a two-year period) were included. Patient comorbidity and data regarding anticoagulation or antiplatelet agent use before hospitalization were collected, in addition to type of VTE prophylaxis and duration of treatment. The primary end point was the development of VTE (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) within one year of presentation.
resultsData from 504 patients admitted with GI bleeding were eligible for review. The total number of VTE events was 20 (4%) while the mortality rate during hospitalization was 4.6%; 397 patients were not given VTE prophylaxis during their hospitalization. Of the patients who were given VTE prophylaxis, 68 received prophylactic heparin or heparin derivatives during their admission. One hundred sixty-five patients had at least one other significant risk factor for VTE including recent or subsequent surgery, past thrombotic event or malignancy. The incidence of thrombosis in those with significant risk factors for VTE was significantly higher than those without (8.5% versus 1.8%; P=0.0009). Overall, there was no significant difference in thrombotic events between individuals receiving pharmacological prophylaxis (1.2%) and those who did not (2.8%) (P=0.4).
conclusionOverall, VTE prophylaxis did not significantly affect thrombotic events in patients admitted for an active GI bleed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.