Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25855741›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2015

Comparison of Immunogenicity in Rhesus Macaques of Transmitted-Founder, HIV-1 Group M Consensus, and Trivalent Mosaic Envelope Vaccines Formulated as a DNA Prime, NYVAC, and Envelope Protein Boost.

Sandrine L Hulot, Bette Korber, Elena E Giorgi, Nathan Vandergrift, Kevin O Saunders, Harikrishnan Balachandran, Linh V Mach, Michelle A Lifton, Giuseppe Pantaleo, Jim Tartaglia and 20 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Highly efficient production of HIV-1Journal of virology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. T cell-based strategies for HIV-1 vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Sandrine L HulotBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Bette KorberLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Elena E GiorgiLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Nathan VandergriftDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kevin O SaundersDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Harikrishnan BalachandranBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Linh V MachBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michelle A LiftonBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Giuseppe PantaleoCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jim TartagliaSanofi-Pasteur, Toronto, Canada.
Sanjay PhogatSanofi-Pasteur, Toronto, Canada.
Bertram JacobsCenter for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Karen KiblerCenter for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Beatriz PerdigueroCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen E GomezCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Madrid, Spain.
Mariano EstebanCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Madrid, Spain.
Margherita RosatiNational Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Barbara K FelberNational Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
George N PavlakisNational Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Robert ParksDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Krissey LloydDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Laura SutherlandDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Richard ScearceDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Norman L LetvinBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael S SeamanBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
S Munir AlamDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
David MontefioriDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Hua-Xin LiaoDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Barton F HaynesDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sampa SantraBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA ssantra@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USHarvard University · USCentro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESNational Cancer Institute · USArizona State University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · USSanofi (Canada) · CAUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Viral Sequencing CoreU19AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HARRISON, STEPHEN COPLAN · 2006 to 2011
$290.5M
Virus biology scientific research support componentUM1AI100645 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCMICHAEL, ANDREW JAMES · 2012 to 2018
$204.7M
The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ROBERT A. PARKER · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
Prevention of AIDSZIABC010350 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FELBER, BARBARA K · 2009 to 2025
$30.0M
New England Primate Research Center Base GrantP51OD011103 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI FLIER, JEFFREY S · 2012 to 2013
$24.7M
Immunotherapeutic Approaches for AIDSZIABC010749 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PAVLAKIS, GEORGE N. · 2009 to 2022
$21.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354NIAID NIH HHS P30-AI060354NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067854NIAID NIH HHS U19-AI067854-07NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI100645NIAID NIH HHS UM1-AI-100645NIH HHS OD011103NIH HHS P51 OD011103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAn effective human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine must induce protective antibody responses, as well as CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses, that can be effective despite extraordinary diversity of HIV-1. The consensus and mosaic immunogens are complete but artificial proteins, computationally designed to elicit immune responses with improved cross-reactive breadth, to attempt to overcome the challenge of global HIV diversity. In this study, we have compared the immunogenicity of a transmitted-founder (T/F) B clade Env (B.1059), a global group M consensus Env (Con-S), and a global trivalent mosaic Env protein in rhesus macaques. These antigens were delivered using a DNA prime-recombinant NYVAC (rNYVAC) vector and Env protein boost vaccination strategy. While Con-S Env was a single sequence, mosaic immunogens were a set of three Envs optimized to include the most common forms of potential T cell epitopes. Both Con-S and mosaic sequences retained common amino acids encompassed by both antibody and T cell epitopes and were central to globally circulating strains. Mosaics and Con-S Envs expressed as full-length proteins bound well to a number of neutralizing antibodies with discontinuous epitopes. Also, both consensus and mosaic immunogens induced significantly higher gamma interferon (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay (ELISpot) responses than B.1059 immunogen. Immunization with these proteins, particularly Con-S, also induced significantly higher neutralizing antibodies to viruses than B.1059 Env, primarily to tier 1 viruses. Both Con-S and mosaics stimulated more potent CD8-T cell responses against heterologous Envs than did B.1059. Both antibody and cellular data from this study strengthen the concept of using in silico-designed centralized immunogens for global HIV-1 vaccine development strategies. IMPORTANCE: There is an increasing appreciation for the importance of vaccine-induced anti-Env antibody responses for preventing HIV-1 acquisition. This nonhuman primate study demonstrates that in silico-designed global HIV-1 immunogens, designed for a human clinical trial, are capable of eliciting not only T lymphocyte responses but also potent anti-Env antibody responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, ViralAspartate AminotransferasesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesConsensus Sequenceenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHumansInterferon-gammaMacaca mulattaSAIDS VaccinesVaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, ViralAspartate Aminotransferasesenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusHIV AntibodiesInterferon-gammaSAIDS VaccinesVaccines, DNAVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID25855741
PMCPMC4474309
OpenAlexW2150466650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.