Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25855685›Full record

ArticleThe Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry2016

Toward understanding the heterogeneity in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Evidence from narratives in adult patients.

Gerrit I Van Schalkwyk, Ish P Bhalla, Matthew Griepp, Benjamin Kelmendi, Larry Davidson, Christopher Pittenger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathological Eating Patterns in Adults Displaying Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: A Scoping Review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Living with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): a South African narrative.International journal of mental health systems · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerrit I Van SchalkwykDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ish P BhallaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Matthew GrieppDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Benjamin KelmendiDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Larry DavidsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA Yale Program for Recovery and Community Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Christopher PittengerDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA Christopher.pittenger@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

Pathophysiologically Realistic Mouse Models of Neuropsychiatric Disease: TouretteR01MH091861 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PITTENGER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
Glutamate in OCD: a magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.R01MH095790 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PITTENGER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091861NIMH NIH HHS R01MH091861NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent attempts at understanding the heterogeneity in obsessive-compulsive disorder have relied on quantitative methods. The results of such work point toward a dimensional structure for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Existing qualitative work in obsessive-compulsive disorder has focused on understanding specific aspects of the obsessive-compulsive disorder experience in greater depth. However, qualitative methods are also of potential value in furthering our understanding of obsessive-compulsive disorder heterogeneity by allowing for open-ended exploration of the obsessive-compulsive disorder experience and correlating identified subtypes with patient narratives.

objectiveWe explored variations in patients' experience prior to, during and immediately after performing their compulsions.

methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder, followed by inductive thematic analysis. Participant responses were not analyzed within the context of an existing theoretical framework, and themes were labeled descriptively.

resultsThe previous dichotomy of 'anxiety' vs 'incompleteness' emerged organically during narrative analysis. In addition, we found that some individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder utilized their behaviors as a way to cope with stress and anxiety more generally. Other participants did not share this experience and denied finding any comfort in their obsessive-compulsive behaviors. The consequences of attentional difficulties were highlighted, with some participants describing how difficulty focusing on a task could influence the need for it to be repeated multiple times.

conclusionsThe extent to which patients use obsessive-compulsive disorder as a coping mechanism is a relevant distinction with potential implications for treatment engagement. Patients may experience ambivalence about suppressing behaviors that they have come to rely upon for management of stress and anxiety, even if these behaviors represent symptoms of a psychiatric illness.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalNarrationAdultAnxietyAttentionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObsessive-Compulsive DisorderQualitative ResearchStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultanxietyattentionObsessive-compulsive disorderphenomenology

Identifiers

PMID25855685
PMCPMC4598276
OpenAlexW2059492987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.