ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015
The role of the posterior cerebellum in saccadic adaptation: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Anticipatory Postural Adjustments in Healthy Adults.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Article
- A triple distinction of cerebellar function for oculomotor learning and fatigue compensation.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- No evidence for differential saccadic adaptation in children and adults with an autism spectrum diagnosis.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023Article
- Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Does Not Affect Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Investigating the effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on saccadic adaptation and cortisol response.Cerebellum & ataxias · 2021Article
- Little Brain, Big Expectations.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- The perils of learning to move while speaking: One-sided interference between speech and visuomotor adaptation.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2020Article
- Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2019Article
- Neural changes associated with cerebellar tDCS studied using MR spectroscopy.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- Eye movements, sensorimotor adaptation and cerebellar-dependent learning in autism: toward potential biomarkers and subphenotypes.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018Review
- Saccade adaptation deficits in developmental dyslexia suggest disruption of cerebellar-dependent learning.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2017Article
- No consistent effect of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on visuomotor adaptation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2017Review
- Sensorimotor adaptation as a behavioural biomarker of early spinocerebellar ataxia type 6.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Impaired Motor Learning in a Disorder of the Inferior Olive: Is the Cerebellum Confused?Cerebellum (London, England) · 2017Article
- Cerebellar tDCS dissociates the timing of perceptual decisions from perceptual change in speech.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The posterior vermis of the cerebellum is considered to be critically involved in saccadic adaptation. However, recent evidence suggests that the adaptive decrease (backward adaptation) and the adaptive increase (forward adaptation) of saccade amplitude rely on partially separate neural substrates. We investigated whether the posterior cerebellum could be differentially involved in backward and forward adaptation by using transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). To do so, participants' saccades were adapted backward or forward while they received anodal, cathodal, or sham TDCS. In two extra groups, subjects underwent a nonadaptation session while receiving anodal or cathodal TDCS to control for the direct effects of TDCS on saccadic execution. Surprisingly, cathodal stimulation tended to increase the extent of both forward and backward adaptations, while anodal TDCS strongly impaired forward adaptation and, to a smaller extent, backward adaptation. Forward adaptation was accompanied by a greater increase in velocity with cathodal stimulation, and reduced duration of change for anodal stimulation. In contrast, the expected velocity decrease in backward adaptation was noticeably weaker with anodal stimulation. Stimulation applied during nonadaptation sessions did not affect saccadic gain, velocity, or duration, demonstrating that the reported effects are not due to direct effects of the stimulation on the generation of eye movements. Our results demonstrate that cerebellar excitability is critical for saccadic adaptation. Based on our results and the growing evidence from studies of vestibulo-ocular reflex and saccadic adaptation, we conclude that the plasticity at the level of the oculomotor vermis is more fundamentally important for forward adaptation than for backward adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.