Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25855120›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2015

A Dual-Carbon-and-Nitrogen Stable Isotope Ratio Model Is Not Superior to a Single-Carbon Stable Isotope Ratio Model for Predicting Added Sugar Intake in Southwest Virginian Adults.

Valisa E Hedrick, Jamie M Zoellner, A Hope Jahren, Natalie A Woodford, Joshua N Bostic, Brenda M Davy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02193009 (SipSmarter), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02193009 nacompletednot on this map

SipSmarter: A Nutrition Literacy Approach to Reducing Sugary Beverages

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityRan2011 to 2015Enrolled304ConditionsDietary Habits, Physical ActivityArmsSipSmarter, MoveMore
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Reply to JCY Louie.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valisa E HedrickDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA; and vhedrick@vt.edu.
Jamie M ZoellnerDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA; and.
A Hope JahrenSchool of Earth and Ocean Science and Technology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI.
Natalie A WoodfordDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA; and.
Joshua N BosticSchool of Earth and Ocean Science and Technology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI.
Brenda M DavyDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA; and.
Virginia Cooperative Extension · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

SIPsmartER: A nutrition literacy approach to reducing sugar-sweetened beveragesR01CA154364 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI ZOELLNER, JAMIE · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA154364-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn objective measure of added sugar (AS) and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake is needed. The δ(13)C value of finger-stick blood is a novel validated biomarker of AS/SSB intake; however, nonsweetener corn products and animal protein also carry a δ(13)C value similar to AS sources, which may affect blood δ(13)C values. The δ(15)N value of blood has been proposed as a "correction factor" for animal protein intake.

objectivesThe objectives were to 1) identify foods associated with δ(13)C and δ(15)N blood values, 2) determine the contribution of nonsweetener corn to the diet relative to AS intake, and 3) determine if the dual-isotope model (δ(13)C and δ(15)N) is a better predictor of AS/SSB intake than δ(13)C alone.

methodsA cross-sectional sample of southwest Virginian adults (n = 257; aged 42 ± 15 y; 74% overweight/obese) underwent dietary intake assessments and provided finger-stick blood samples, which were analyzed for δ(13)C and δ(15)N values by using natural abundance stable isotope mass spectrometry. Statistical analyses included ANOVAs, paired-samples t tests, and multiple linear regressions.

resultsThe mean ± SD daily AS intake was 88 ± 59 g and nonsweetener corn intake was 13 ± 13 g. The mean δ(13)C value was -19.1 ± 0.9‰, which was significantly correlated with AS and SSB intakes (r = 0.32 and 0.39, respectively; P ≤ 0.01). The δ(13)C value and nonsweetener corn intake and the δ(15)N value and animal protein intake were not correlated. AS intake was significantly greater than nonsweetener corn intake (mean difference = 76.2 ± 57.2 g; P ≤ 0.001). The δ(13)C value was predictive of AS/SSB intake (β range: 0.28-0.35; P ≤ 0.01); however, δ(15)N was not predictive and minimal increases in R(2) values were observed when the δ(15)N value was added to the model.

conclusionsThe data do not provide evidence that the dual-isotope method is superior for predicting AS/SSB intakes within a southwest Virginian population. Our results support the potential of the δ(13)C value of finger-stick blood to serve as an objective measure of AS/SSB intake. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02193009.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBeveragesBiomarkersBody Mass IndexCarbohydratesCarbon IsotopesCross-Sectional StudiesDietDietary ProteinsEnergy IntakeHumansMiddle AgedBiomarkersCarbohydratesCarbon IsotopesDietary ProteinsNitrogen IsotopesSweetening Agentsadded sugarsbiomarker validationdietary assessmentobesitysugar-sweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID25855120
PMCPMC4442118
OpenAlexW2102422429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.