Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25855118›Full record

ReviewJournal of proteome research2015

Review, evaluation, and discussion of the challenges of missing value imputation for mass spectrometry-based label-free global proteomics.

Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson, Holli K Wiberg, Melissa M Matzke, Joseph N Brown, Jing Wang, Jason E McDermott, Richard D Smith, Karin D Rodland, Thomas O Metz, Joel G Pounds and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of proteome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Classification with Missing Data - AbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bobbie-Jo M Webb-RobertsonPacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Holli K WibergPacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Melissa M MatzkePacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Joseph N BrownPacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Jing WangPacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Jason E McDermottPacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Richard D SmithPacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Karin D RodlandPacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Thomas O MetzPacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Joel G PoundsPacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Katrina M WatersPacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO BOX 999, K7-20, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.

Funding

WORKSHOP AND TRAINING ACTIVITIESP41RR018522 · NCRR · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI BELOV, MIKHAIL · 2003 to 2011
$25.1M
Equipment Supplement Request for a Research Resource for Ultra-sensitive High Throughput ProteomicsP41GM103493 · NIGMS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2012 to 2022
$22.6M
MOUSE BIOMARKER DISCOVERY AND VALIDATION STUDIESU54ES016015 · NIEHS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI POUNDS, JOEL G · 2007 to 2010
$5.8M
Adv.Proteomics & Metabolomics:Type 2 Diabet & Pre-DiabetR33DK071283 · NIDDK · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2007 to 2009
$1.6M
Interactive Informatics Resource for Research-driven Cancer ProteomicsU01CA184783 · NCI · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI WEBB-ROBERTSON, BOBBIE-JO MARY · 2014 to 2016
$1.3M
Adv.Proteomics &Metabolomics:Type 2 Diabet &Pre-DiabetR21DK071283 · NIDDK · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2005 to 2006
$656k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA184783NCI NIH HHS U01CA184783-01NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR018522NCRR NIH HHS P41-RR018522NIDDK NIH HHS DK071283NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK071283NIDDK NIH HHS R33 DK071283NIEHS NIH HHS U54 ES016015NIEHS NIH HHS U54-ES016015NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103493NIGMS NIH HHS P41-GM103493PHS HHS HHSN27220080060C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we apply selected imputation strategies to label-free liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) proteomics datasets to evaluate the accuracy with respect to metrics of variance and classification. We evaluate several commonly used imputation approaches for individual merits and discuss the caveats of each approach with respect to the example LC-MS proteomics data. In general, local similarity-based approaches, such as the regularized expectation maximization and least-squares adaptive algorithms, yield the best overall performances with respect to metrics of accuracy and robustness. However, no single algorithm consistently outperforms the remaining approaches, and in some cases, performing classification without imputation sometimes yielded the most accurate classification. Thus, because of the complex mechanisms of missing data in proteomics, which also vary from peptide to protein, no individual method is a single solution for imputation. On the basis of the observations in this review, the goal for imputation in the field of computational proteomics should be to develop new approaches that work generically for this data type and new strategies to guide users in the selection of the best imputation for their dataset and analysis objectives.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBlood ProteinsChromatography, LiquidHumansLungMass SpectrometryMicePeptidesProteomicsBlood ProteinsPeptidesaccuracyclassificationImputationlabel freemean-square errorpeak intensity

Identifiers

PMID25855118
PMCPMC4776766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.