Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25854580›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2015

Data analysis as a source of variability of the HLA-peptide multimer assay: from manual gating to automated recognition of cell clusters.

Cécile Gouttefangeas, Cliburn Chan, Sebastian Attig, Tania T Køllgaard, Hans-Georg Rammensee, Stefan Stevanović, Dorothee Wernet, Per thor Straten, Marij J P Welters, Christian Ottensmeier and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimization in Detection of Antigen-Specific T Cells Through Differentially Labeled MHC Multimers.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Single-cell technologies in reproductive immunology.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cécile GouttefangeasDepartment of Immunology, Institute for Cell Biology, Eberhard Karls University, Auf der Morgenstelle 15, 72076, Tübingen, Germany, cecile.gouttefangeas@uni-tuebingen.de.
Cliburn Chan
Sebastian Attig
Tania T Køllgaard
Hans-Georg Rammensee
Stefan Stevanović
Dorothee Wernet
Per thor Straten
Marij J P Welters
Christian Ottensmeier
Sjoerd H van der Burg
Cedrik M Britten

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Cancer Research UK 15951Cancer Research UK 20613NIAID NIH HHS 5P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000045CNIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparameter flow cytometry is an indispensable method for assessing antigen-specific T cells in basic research and cancer immunotherapy. Proficiency panels have shown that cell sample processing, test protocols and data analysis may all contribute to the variability of the results obtained by laboratories performing ex vivo T cell immune monitoring. In particular, analysis currently relies on a manual, step-by-step strategy employing serial gating decisions based on visual inspection of one- or two-dimensional plots. It is therefore operator dependent and subjective. In the context of continuing efforts to support inter-laboratory T cell assay harmonization, the CIMT Immunoguiding Program organized its third proficiency panel dedicated to the detection of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells by HLA-peptide multimer staining. We first assessed the contribution of manual data analysis to the variability of reported T cell frequencies within a group of laboratories staining and analyzing the same cell samples with their own reagents and protocols. The results show that data analysis is a source of variation in the multimer assay outcome. To evaluate whether an automated analysis approach can reduce variability of proficiency panel data, we used a hierarchical statistical mixture model to identify cell clusters. Challenges for automated analysis were the need to process non-standardized data sets from multiple centers, and the fact that the antigen-specific cell frequencies were very low in most samples. We show that this automated method can circumvent difficulties inherent to manual gating strategies and is broadly applicable for experiments performed with heterogeneous protocols and reagents.

Indexed as

CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesData Interpretation, StatisticalElectronic Data ProcessingFlow CytometryHealthy VolunteersHLA AntigensHumansMonitoring, ImmunologicObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsHLA Antigens

Identifiers

PMID25854580
PMCPMC4528367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.