ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2015
Data analysis as a source of variability of the HLA-peptide multimer assay: from manual gating to automated recognition of cell clusters.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fully synthetic replication of complex real biological cell clusters using a novel cluster-based 'Rosetta-Routine' computational modelling process.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Unsupervised Analysis of Flow Cytometry Data in a Clinical Setting Captures Cell Diversity and Allows Population Discovery.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Introduction to Multiparametric Flow Cytometry and Analysis of High-Dimensional Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer clinical and biomarkers data sharing resource document: Volume II-practical challenges.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2020Article
- Optimization in Detection of Antigen-Specific T Cells Through Differentially Labeled MHC Multimers.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2020Article
- Review
- Adhering to adhesion: assessing integrin conformation to monitor T cells.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2019Review
- Single-cell technologies in reproductive immunology.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2019Review
- Automated Analysis of Flow Cytometry Data to Reduce Inter-Lab Variation in the Detection of Major Histocompatibility Complex Multimer-Binding T Cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Article
- Computational flow cytometry: helping to make sense of high-dimensional immunology data.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2016Review
- Toward harmonized phenotyping of human myeloid-derived suppressor cells by flow cytometry: results from an interim study.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2016Article
- An Introduction to Automated Flow Cytometry Gating Tools and Their Implementation.Frontiers in immunology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiparameter flow cytometry is an indispensable method for assessing antigen-specific T cells in basic research and cancer immunotherapy. Proficiency panels have shown that cell sample processing, test protocols and data analysis may all contribute to the variability of the results obtained by laboratories performing ex vivo T cell immune monitoring. In particular, analysis currently relies on a manual, step-by-step strategy employing serial gating decisions based on visual inspection of one- or two-dimensional plots. It is therefore operator dependent and subjective. In the context of continuing efforts to support inter-laboratory T cell assay harmonization, the CIMT Immunoguiding Program organized its third proficiency panel dedicated to the detection of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells by HLA-peptide multimer staining. We first assessed the contribution of manual data analysis to the variability of reported T cell frequencies within a group of laboratories staining and analyzing the same cell samples with their own reagents and protocols. The results show that data analysis is a source of variation in the multimer assay outcome. To evaluate whether an automated analysis approach can reduce variability of proficiency panel data, we used a hierarchical statistical mixture model to identify cell clusters. Challenges for automated analysis were the need to process non-standardized data sets from multiple centers, and the fact that the antigen-specific cell frequencies were very low in most samples. We show that this automated method can circumvent difficulties inherent to manual gating strategies and is broadly applicable for experiments performed with heterogeneous protocols and reagents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.