Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25854310›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2015

Medication use during end-of-life care in a palliative care centre.

Anniek D Masman, Monique van Dijk, Dick Tibboel, Frans P M Baar, Ron A A Mathôt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anniek D MasmanPain Expertise Centre, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.masman@erasmusmc.nl.
Monique van DijkPain Expertise Centre, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dick TibboelPain Expertise Centre, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frans P M BaarPain Expertise Centre, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron A A MathôtPain Expertise Centre, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn end-of-life care, symptoms of discomfort are mainly managed by drug therapy, the guidelines for which are mainly based on expert opinions. A few papers have inventoried drug prescriptions in palliative care settings, but none has reported the frequency of use in combination with doses and route of administration.

objectiveTo describe doses and routes of administration of the most frequently used drugs at admission and at day of death. Setting Palliative care centre in the Netherlands.

methodIn this retrospective cohort study, prescription data of deceased patients were extracted from the electronic medical records.

main outcome measureDoses, frequency and route of administration of prescribed drugs

resultsAll regular medication prescriptions of 208 patients, 89% of whom had advanced cancer, were reviewed. The three most prescribed drugs were morphine, midazolam and haloperidol, to 21, 11 and 23% of patients at admission, respectively. At the day of death these percentages had increased to 87, 58 and 50%, respectively. Doses of these three drugs at the day of death were statistically significantly higher than at admission. The oral route of administration was used in 89% of patients at admission versus subcutaneous in 94% at the day of death.

conclusionsNearing the end of life, patients in this palliative care centre receive discomfort-relieving drugs mainly via the subcutaneous route. However, most of these drugs are unlicensed for this specific application and guidelines are based on low level of evidence. Thus, there is every reason for more clinical research on drug use in palliative care.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration RoutesAgedAged, 80 and overDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNetherlandsPalliative CareRetrospective StudiesTerminal CareDrug therapyDrug utilizationNetherlandsPalliative carePharmaceutical preparationsPrescriptionsTerminal care

Identifiers

PMID25854310
PMCPMC4594093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.