Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25854182›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2015

High-throughput functional genomics using CRISPR-Cas9.

Ophir Shalem, Neville E Sanjana, Feng Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 699 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
699citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
67.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

699 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CRISPR/Cas9 mediates precise and efficient gene editing inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Primary cilia and neural computation.Journal of biomedical science · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

639 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ophir ShalemBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, and Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Neville E SanjanaBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, and Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Feng ZhangBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, and Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
McGovern Institute for Brain Research · US

Funding

Probing Neuropsychiatric Diseases Using Targeted Epigenome and Genome EngineeringDP1MH100706 · NIMH · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI ZHANG, FENG · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
Genome engineering tools for functional screening of non-coding elementsK99HG008171 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SANJANA, NEVILLE · 2015 to 2016
$125k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP1‑MH100706NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG008171NHGRI NIH HHS K99‑HG008171NIMH NIH HHS DP1 MH100706NINDS NIH HHS R01‑NS07312401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forward genetic screens are powerful tools for the discovery and functional annotation of genetic elements. Recently, the RNA-guided CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)-associated Cas9 nuclease has been combined with genome-scale guide RNA libraries for unbiased, phenotypic screening. In this Review, we describe recent advances using Cas9 for genome-scale screens, including knockout approaches that inactivate genomic loci and strategies that modulate transcriptional activity. We discuss practical aspects of screen design, provide comparisons with RNA interference (RNAi) screening, and outline future applications and challenges.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsGene Knockout TechniquesGene LibraryGenetic TestingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiceModels, GeneticRNA Interference

Identifiers

PMID25854182
PMCPMC4503232
OpenAlexW2026592619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.