ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2015
[Biologics therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus. Current situation].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- [Therapeutic strategies for systemic lupus erythematosus].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproved understanding of the immunopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has paved the way for new specific immune interventions for this inflammatory disease similar to those for rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthritides.
methodsNew biologics were developed on this basis or are in the process of clinical development and open up new therapy options for patients. In this context belimumab is of particular importance. As an innovative biologic the monoclonal antibody against the cytokine BAFF/BLyS (belimumab) has been approved for the treatment of serologically active SLE. A number of other biologics against other cytokines are in the clinical development phase and appear to be promising for further improvement of the current therapeutic possibilities in SLE. This article addresses the current aspects of immune interventions with biologics for SLE and the specific challenges of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.