Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25853729›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Time, monetary and other costs of participation in family-based child weight management interventions: qualitative and systematic review evidence.

Lisa Arai, Monica Panca, Steve Morris, Katherine Curtis-Tyler, Patricia J Lucas, Helen M Roberts

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early Nutritional Education in the Prevention of Childhood Obesity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. The lived experience of weight loss maintenance in young people.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa AraiSchool of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Borough Road, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Monica PancaResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Rowland Hill Street, London, United Kingdom.
Steve MorrisDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, United Kingdom.
Katherine Curtis-TylerSchool of Health Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, London, United Kingdom.
Patricia J LucasSchool for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Helen M RobertsUniversity College London Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health 09/3005/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood overweight and obesity have health and economic impacts on individuals and the wider society. Families participating in weight management programmes may foresee or experience monetary and other costs which deter them from signing up to or completing programmes. This is recognised in the health economics literature, though within this sparse body of work, costs to families are often narrowly defined and not fully accounted for. A societal perspective incorporating a broader array of costs may provide a more accurate picture. This paper brings together a review of the health economics literature on the costs to families attending child weight management programmes with qualitative data from families participating in a programme to manage child overweight and obesity.

methodsA search identified economic evaluation studies of lifestyle interventions in childhood obesity. The qualitative work drew on interviews with families who attended a weight management intervention in three UK regions.

resultsWe identified four cost-effectiveness analyses that include information on costs to families. These were categorised as direct (e.g. monetary) and indirect (e.g. time) costs. Our analysis of qualitative data demonstrated that, for families who attended the programme, costs were associated both with participation on the scheme and with maintaining a healthy lifestyle afterwards. Respondents reported three kinds of cost: time-related, social/emotional and monetary.

conclusionSocietal approaches to measuring cost-effectiveness provide a framework for assessing the monetary and non-monetary costs borne by participants attending treatment programmes. From this perspective, all costs should be considered in any analysis of cost-effectiveness. Our data suggest that family costs are important, and may act as a barrier to the uptake, completion and maintenance of behaviours to reduce child obesity. These findings have implications for the development and implementation of child weight initiatives in particular, in relation to reducing inequalities in health.

Indexed as

Body WeightCost-Benefit AnalysisDietEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansPediatric ObesityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25853729
PMCPMC4390145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.