Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25853654›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Immune protection against Trypanosoma cruzi induced by TcVac4 in a canine model.

José E Aparicio-Burgos, José A Zepeda-Escobar, Roberto Montes de Oca-Jimenez, José G Estrada-Franco, Alberto Barbabosa-Pliego, Laucel Ochoa-García, Ricardo Alejandre-Aguilar, Nancy Rivas, Giovanna Peñuelas-Rivas, Margarita Val-Arreola and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Vaccines against chronicExpert review of vaccines · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Update on Vaccines AgainstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Nasal vaccination againstFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Chagas Disease: A Silent Threat for Dogs and Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Using data-driven approaches to improve delivery of animal health care interventions for public health.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

José E Aparicio-BurgosEscuela Superior de Apan-Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Apan Hidalgo, México.
José A Zepeda-EscobarCentro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Salud Animal, Universidad Autónoma de Estado de México, Toluca, México.
Roberto Montes de Oca-JimenezCentro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Salud Animal, Universidad Autónoma de Estado de México, Toluca, México.
José G Estrada-FrancoCentro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Salud Animal, Universidad Autónoma de Estado de México, Toluca, México.
Alberto Barbabosa-PliegoCentro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Salud Animal, Universidad Autónoma de Estado de México, Toluca, México.
Laucel Ochoa-GarcíaLaboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública del Instituto Salud del Estado de México, Toluca, México.
Ricardo Alejandre-AguilarLaboratorio de Entomología, Departamento de Parasitología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México City, México.
Nancy RivasLaboratorio de Entomología, Departamento de Parasitología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México City, México.
Giovanna Peñuelas-RivasCentro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Salud Animal, Universidad Autónoma de Estado de México, Toluca, México.
Margarita Val-ArreolaHospital General de Zona No. 2, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Irapuato, México.
Shivali GuptaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Felix Salazar-GarcíaCentro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Salud Animal, Universidad Autónoma de Estado de México, Toluca, México.
Nisha J GargDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, Texas, United States of America; Department of Pathology, and Faculty of the Institute for Human Infection and Immunity, and the Sealy Center for Vaccine Development, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Juan C Vázquez-ChagoyánCentro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Salud Animal, Universidad Autónoma de Estado de México, Toluca, México.
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USHospital General De Zona · MXInstituto de Salud del Estado de México · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo · MX

Funding

Testing DNA Vaccine Against T. cruzi in Large Animal Model (Dogs)R03AI072538 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GARG, NISHA JAIN · 2008 to 2010
$218k
NIAID NIH HHS AI072538NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI072538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chagas disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, is endemic in southern parts of the American continent. Herein, we have tested the protective efficacy of a DNA-prime/T. rangeli-boost (TcVac4) vaccine in a dog (Canis familiaris) model. Dogs were immunized with two-doses of DNA vaccine (pcDNA3.1 encoding TcG1, TcG2, and TcG4 antigens plus IL-12- and GM-CSF-encoding plasmids) followed by two doses of glutaraldehyde-inactivated T. rangeli epimastigotes (TrIE); and challenged with highly pathogenic T. cruzi (SylvioX10/4) isolate. Dogs given TrIE or empty pcDNA3.1 were used as controls. We monitored post-vaccination and post-challenge infection antibody response by an ELISA, parasitemia by blood analysis and xenodiagnosis, and heart function by electrocardiography. Post-mortem anatomic and pathologic evaluation of the heart was conducted. TcVac4 induced a strong IgG response (IgG2>IgG1) that was significantly expanded post-infection, and moved to a nearly balanced IgG2/IgG1 response in chronic phase. In comparison, dogs given TrIE or empty plasmid DNA only developed high IgG titers with IgG2 predominance in response to T. cruzi infection. Blood parasitemia, tissue parasite foci, parasite transmission to triatomines, electrocardiographic abnormalities were significantly lower in TcVac4-vaccinated dogs than was observed in dogs given TrIE or empty plasmid DNA only. Macroscopic and microscopic alterations, the hallmarks of chronic Chagas disease, were significantly decreased in the myocardium of TcVac4-vaccinated dogs. We conclude that TcVac4 induced immunity was beneficial in providing resistance to T. cruzi infection, evidenced by control of chronic pathology of the heart and preservation of cardiac function in dogs. Additionally, TcVac4 vaccination decreased the transmission of parasites from vaccinated/infected animals to triatomines.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanChagas DiseaseDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayImmunoglobulin GInterleukin-12MyocardiumParasitemiaPlasmidsProtozoan VaccinesTrypanosoma cruziVaccinationVaccines, DNAAntibodies, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GInterleukin-12Protozoan VaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID25853654
PMCPMC4390229
OpenAlexW2042247311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.