ArticleFamily medicine2015
Longitudinal hyperlipidemia outcomes at three student-run free clinic sites.
Article in Family medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of student-led health interventions on patient outcomes for those with cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Pooled it
- Formerly incarcerated patient care in student-run clinics: substance use patterns and opportunities for intervention.BMC public health · 2026Article
- A Pilot Study of Hemoglobin A1C Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes after Creation of a Patient Assistance Program Enrollment Committee at a Student-Run Free Clinic.Innovations in pharmacy · 2024Article
- A Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Program to Improve Diabetes Care at a Free Clinic.Cureus · 2023Article
- Comparison of quality metrics in an education-centered medical home with local and national benchmarks.Medical education online · 2022Article
- Assessment of Glycemic Control at St. Luke's Free Medical Clinic: Retrospective Chart Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2022Article
- Don't Let Perfect Be the Enemy of Good: A Proof of Concept for a Custom National Data Repository of Quality Measures for Free and Charitable Clinics.Health equity · 2022Article
- Patient Outcomes from Student-Run Health Services: An Integrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Review
- Article
- Longitudinal Hypertension Outcomes at Four Student-Run Free Clinic Sites.Family medicine · 2017Article
- Improving Quality of Life in Underserved Communities: A Case from Humanity Initiative's Student-Led Clinics.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Assessing Community Needs Among Spanish-Speaking Patients in a Free Clinic Setting.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesStudent-run free clinics (SRFC) aim to improve health outcomes of vulnerable populations by providing care to those who have difficulty accessing the traditional health care safety net. Reducing low density lipoprotein (LDL) is known to improve health outcomes, yet uninsured patients remain especially susceptible to poor control. This study describes hyperlipidemia control over time among patients who received care at three University of California San Diego Student-Run Free Clinic Project (SRFCP) sites.
methodsThe authors performed a retrospective review of clinic visits from August 2006--November 2010 from three sites of the SRFCP. Patients with a new diagnosis of hyperlipidemia, a baseline LDL level, and at least one follow-up LDL drawn between 6 weeks and 18 months were included in this study (n=96). Hyperlipidemia control was analyzed using descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact tests, paired t tests, and binary logistic regression.
resultsAt the last visit, 58.3% (56/96) of patients had achieved LDL goal. LDL decreased from a baseline mean of 135.8 mg/dL to 101.3mg/dL among the cohort (P<.001). Statins were used in 86.5% (83/96) of patients. No significant differences were noted when stratified by language, gender, diabetes comorbidity, homelessness, or clinic site. When comparing Hispanics and Caucasians only, Hispanic patients had better LDL control than Caucasians.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that a SRFC can effectively manage hyperlipidemia over time, and rates of control can exceed national standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25853603PMC6369692W2441955145What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.