ArticlePloS one2015
Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 biomarker serum immunoassay in combination with PSA is a more specific diagnostic tool for detection of prostate cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of GDF15 Significance as a Biomarker in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Identification of a ferroptosis related genes signature and GDF15 contributing to a new perspective for the diagnosis of CRPC.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- GDF15 is associated with thyroid cancer progression and may modulate thyroid cancer cell senescence in a p53-dependent manner.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Article
- Macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 in cancer: Beyond the cellular phenotype.Cancer letters · 2022Review
- Pathophysiological role of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) in obesity, cancer, and cachexia.Cytokine & growth factor reviews · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 as a clinical marker for non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Growth/Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15): From Biomarker to Novel Targetable Immune Checkpoint.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Article
- Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15): A survival protein with therapeutic potential in metabolic diseases.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2019Review
- Role of GDF15 in methylseleninic acid-mediated inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis in prostate cancer cells.PloS one · 2019Article
- Research status and progress of the RNA or protein biomarkers for prostate cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Review
- Distinct response to GDF15 knockdown in pediatric and adult glioblastoma cell lines.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- GDF15 and Growth Control.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
- Relevance of MIC-1 in the Era of PSA as a Serum Based Predictor of Prostate Cancer: A Critical Evaluation.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Urinary Polyamines: A Pilot Study on Their Roles as Prostate Cancer Detection Biomarkers.PloS one · 2016Article
- New Progress of Epigenetic Biomarkers in Urological Cancer.Disease markers · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy among men in the United States. Though highly sensitive, the often-used prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test has low specificity which leads to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of PCa. This paper presents results of a retrospective study that indicates that testing for macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 (MIC-1) concentration along with the PSA assay could provide much improved specificity to the assay.
methodsThe MIC-1 serum level was determined by a novel p-Chip-based immunoassay run on 70 retrospective samples. The assay was configured on p-Chips, small integrated circuits (IC) capable of storing in their electronic memories a serial number to identify the molecular probe immobilized on its surface. The distribution of MIC-1 and pre-determined PSA concentrations were displayed in a 2D plot and the predictive power of the dual MIC-1/PSA assay was analyzed.
resultsMIC-1 concentration in serum was elevated in PCa patients (1.44 ng/ml) compared to normal and biopsy-negative individuals (0.93 ng/ml and 0.88 ng/ml, respectively). In addition, the MIC-1 level was correlated with the progression of PCa. The area under the receiver operator curve (AUC-ROC) was 0.81 providing an assay sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 60.7% by using a cutoff of 0.494 for the logistic regression value of MIC-1 and PSA. Another approach, by defining high-frequency PCa zones in a two-dimensional plot, resulted in assay sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 89.3%.
conclusionsThe analysis based on correlation of MIC-1 and PSA concentrations in serum with the patient PCa status improved the specificity of PCa diagnosis without compromising the high sensitivity of the PSA test alone and has potential for PCa prognosis for patient therapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.