Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25853517›Full record

ArticleHeredity2015

Phosphine resistance in India is characterised by a dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase variant that is otherwise unobserved in eukaryotes.

R Kaur, M Subbarayalu, R Jagadeesan, G J Daglish, M K Nayak, H R Naik, S Ramasamy, C Subramanian, P R Ebert, D I Schlipalius

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

R Kaur1] School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia [2] Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Ecosciences Precinct, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia [3] Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre (PBCRC), Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
M SubbarayaluDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
R Jagadeesan1] School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia [2] Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Ecosciences Precinct, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
G J Daglish1] Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Ecosciences Precinct, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia [2] Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre (PBCRC), Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
M K Nayak1] Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Ecosciences Precinct, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia [2] Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre (PBCRC), Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
H R NaikDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
S RamasamyDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
C SubramanianDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
P R EbertSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
D I Schlipalius1] Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Ecosciences Precinct, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia [2] Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre (PBCRC), Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University · INDepartment of Primary Industries · AUThe University of Queensland · AUPlant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphine (PH3) fumigation is the primary method worldwide for controlling insect pests of stored commodities. Over-reliance on phosphine, however, has led to the emergence of strong resistance. Detailed genetic studies previously identified two loci, rph1 and rph2, that interact synergistically to create a strong resistance phenotype. We compared the genetics of phosphine resistance in strains of Rhyzopertha dominica and Tribolium castaneum from India and Australia, countries having similar pest species but widely differing in pest management practices. Sequencing analysis of the rph2 locus, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (dld), identified two structurally equivalent variants, Proline49>Serine (P49S) in one R. dominica strain and P45S in three strains of T. castaneum from India. These variants of the DLD protein likely affect FAD cofactor interaction with the enzyme. A survey of insects from storage facilities across southern India revealed that the P45/49S variant is distributed throughout the region at very high frequencies, in up to 94% of R. dominica and 97% of T. castaneum in the state of Tamil Nadu. The abundance of the P45/49S variant in insect populations contrasted sharply with the evolutionary record in which the variant was absent from eukaryotic DLD sequences. This suggests that the variant is unlikely to provide a strong selective advantage in the absence of phosphine fumigation.

Indexed as

PhosphinesAnimalsAustraliaColeopteraDihydrolipoamide DehydrogenaseEvolution, MolecularFood StorageFumigationGene FrequencyIndiaInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesInsect ProteinsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNATriboliumDihydrolipoamide DehydrogenaseInsecticidesInsect ProteinsphosphinePhosphines

Identifiers

PMID25853517
PMCPMC4814238
OpenAlexW2029557687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.