Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25853412›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Phylogenetic molecular species delimitations unravel potential new species in the pest genus Spodoptera Guenée, 1852 (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).

Pascaline Dumas, Jérôme Barbut, Bruno Le Ru, Jean-François Silvain, Anne-Laure Clamens, Emmanuelle d'Alençon, Gael J Kergoat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phylogeography ofParasitology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diversity ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pest risk assessment ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Pascaline DumasInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jérôme BarbutDirection des collections-USM 602, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Bruno Le RuIRD/CNRS, Laboratoire Evolution Génomes Spéciation, Avenue de la terrasse, Gif-sur-Yvette, France and Université Paris-Sud 11, Orsay, France; Unité de Recherche IRD 072, African Insect Science for Food and Health (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Jean-François SilvainIRD/CNRS, Laboratoire Evolution Génomes Spéciation, Avenue de la terrasse, Gif-sur-Yvette, France and Université Paris-Sud 11, Orsay, France.
Anne-Laure ClamensINRA-UMR 1062 CBGP (INRA, IRD, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro), Montferrier-sur-Lez, France.
Emmanuelle d'AlençonUM2-UMR 1333 DGIMI, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France; INRA-UMR 1333 DGIMI, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France.
Gael J KergoatINRA-UMR 1062 CBGP (INRA, IRD, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro), Montferrier-sur-Lez, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRDiversité, génomes et interactions micro-organismes-insectes · FRInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRMuséum national d'Histoire naturelle · FRUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays molecular species delimitation methods promote the identification of species boundaries within complex taxonomic groups by adopting innovative species concepts and theories (e.g. branching patterns, coalescence). As some of them can efficiently deal with large single-locus datasets, they could speed up the process of species discovery compared to more time consuming molecular methods, and benefit from the existence of large public datasets; these methods can also particularly favour scientific research and actions dealing with threatened or economically important taxa. In this study we aim to investigate and clarify the status of economically important moths species belonging to the genus Spodoptera (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), a complex group in which previous phylogenetic analyses and integrative approaches already suggested the possible occurrence of cryptic species and taxonomic ambiguities. In this work, the effectiveness of innovative (and faster) species delimitation approaches to infer putative species boundaries has been successfully tested in Spodoptera, by processing the most comprehensive dataset (in terms of number of species and specimens) ever achieved; results are congruent and reliable, irrespective of the set of parameters and phylogenetic models applied. Our analyses confirm the existence of three potential new species clusters (for S. exigua (Hübner, 1808), S. frugiperda (J.E. Smith, 1797) and S. mauritia (Boisduval, 1833)) and support the synonymy of S. marima (Schaus, 1904) with S. ornithogalli (Guenée, 1852). They also highlight the ambiguity of the status of S. cosmiodes (Walker, 1858) and S. descoinsi Lalanne-Cassou & Silvain, 1994. This case study highlights the interest of molecular species delimitation methods as valuable tools for species discovery and to emphasize taxonomic ambiguities.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationPhylogenyAnimalsEvolution, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataSpodoptera

Identifiers

PMID25853412
PMCPMC4390195
OpenAlexW2039380629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.