Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25853028›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2015

A population-based analysis of outcomes for small cell carcinoma of the breast by tumor stage and the use of radiation therapy.

Felicia Hare, Smith Giri, Jashmin K Patel, Andrew Hahn, Michael G Martin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a review of literature.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation: an update based on the latest WHO classification.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Neuroendocrine Cancer of the Breast: A Rare Entity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felicia HareDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.
Smith GiriDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.
Jashmin K PatelDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, The West Cancer Center/University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 1588 Union Ave., Memphis, TN 38104 USA.
Andrew HahnDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.
Michael G MartinDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, The West Cancer Center/University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 1588 Union Ave., Memphis, TN 38104 USA.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrimary small cell carcinomas of the breast (SCCB) are rare tumors with limited data on outcomes and treatment strategies. Using a population based approach, we aimed to study outcomes of SCCB and determine whether the use of radiation therapy is associated with better survival among patients with SCCB.

methodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry, we identified patients with SCCB between1973 and 2010. We examined the stage specific survival of these patients and compared it to the stage specific survival of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) from the SEER database over the same accrual period. We further analyzed the impact of radiation therapy on overall survival for SCCB patients using a univariate and multivariate approach.

resultsA total of 199 patients with primary SCCB with staging were identified during the study period. Eighty-four patients (42%) had localized disease, 77 (39%) had regional disease and 38 (19%) had distant disease. For comparison, 81,933 patients with SCLC were identified. Outcomes were superior for patients with SCCB with localized (150 vs. 16 months, p < 0.01) and regional disease (56 vs. 13 months, p < 0.01), but not distant disease (7 vs. 7 months, p = 0.43). Use of radiation therapy was not associated with a significant difference in OS for patients with either localized (202 vs. 147 months, p = 0.48) or regional (52 vs. 75 months, p = 0.650) disease.

conclusionsSCCB has a more favorable prognosis by stage for localized and regional disease than SCLC. Adjuvant radiation is not associated with an improvement in survival for patients with localized or regional SCCB in this dataset.

Indexed as

BreastNeuroendocrinePrognosisRadiationSmall cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID25853028
PMCPMC4382500
OpenAlexW2116625659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.