Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25852945›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2015

Predicting risk of COPD in primary care: development and validation of a clinical risk score.

Shamil Haroon, Peymane Adab, Richard D Riley, Tom Marshall, Robert Lancashire, Rachel E Jordan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Validation of a Cox prognostic model for tooth autotransplantation.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2023
    Article
  3. Questionnaires and risk scores: how to transform research projects into practical tools.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023
    Article
  4. Current Progress of COPD Early Detection: Key Points and Novel Strategies.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Are clinical risk scores for COPD useful?BMJ open respiratory research · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shamil HaroonDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics , School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.
Peymane AdabDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics , School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.
Richard D RileyDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics , School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.
Tom MarshallDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics , School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.
Robert LancashireDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics , School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.
Rachel E JordanDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics , School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2011-04-064Department of Health PDF/01/023Department of Health RP-PG-0109-10061Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a clinical risk score to identify patients at risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using clinical factors routinely recorded in primary care.

designCase-control study of patients containing one incident COPD case to two controls matched on age, sex and general practice. Candidate risk factors were included in a conditional logistic regression model to produce a clinical score. Accuracy of the score was estimated on a separate external validation sample derived from 20 purposively selected practices.

settingUK general practices enrolled in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1 January 2000 to 31 March 2006).

participantsDevelopment sample included 340 practices containing 15 159 newly diagnosed COPD cases and 28 296 controls (mean age 70 years, 52% male). Validation sample included 2259 cases and 4196 controls (mean age 70 years, 50% male).

main outcome measuresArea under the receiver operator characteristic curve (c statistic), sensitivity and specificity in the validation practices.

resultsThe model included four variables including smoking status, history of asthma, and lower respiratory tract infections and prescription of salbutamol in the previous 3 years. It had a high average c statistic of 0.85 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.86) and yielded a sensitivity of 63.2% (95% CI 63.1 to 63.3) and specificity 87.4% (95% CI 87.3 to 87.5).

conclusionsRisk factors associated with COPD and routinely recorded in primary care have been used to develop and externally validate a new COPD risk score. This could be used to target patients for case finding.

Indexed as

Clinical EpidemiologyCOPD epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID25852945
PMCPMC4379885
OpenAlexW2161788971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.