Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25852671›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Systems modeling approaches for microbial community studies: from metagenomics to inference of the community structure.

Mark Hanemaaijer, Wilfred F M Röling, Brett G Olivier, Ruchir A Khandelwal, Bas Teusink, Frank J Bruggeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biology and medicine in the landscape of quantum advantages.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Formation, characterization and modeling of emergent synthetic microbial communities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Modeling a co-culture ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark HanemaaijerSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Molecular Cell Physiology, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Wilfred F M RölingMolecular Cell Physiology, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Brett G OlivierSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ruchir A KhandelwalSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Molecular Cell Physiology, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bas TeusinkSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Frank J BruggemanSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities play important roles in health, industrial applications and earth's ecosystems. With current molecular techniques we can characterize these systems in unprecedented detail. However, such methods provide little mechanistic insight into how the genetic properties and the dynamic couplings between individual microorganisms give rise to their dynamic activities. Neither do they give insight into what we call "the community state", that is the fluxes and concentrations of nutrients within the community. This knowledge is a prerequisite for rational control and intervention in microbial communities. Therefore, the inference of the community structure from experimental data is a major current challenge. We will argue that this inference problem requires mathematical models that can integrate heterogeneous experimental data with existing knowledge. We propose that two types of models are needed. Firstly, mathematical models that integrate existing genomic, physiological, and physicochemical information with metagenomics data so as to maximize information content and predictive power. This can be achieved with the use of constraint-based genome-scale stoichiometric modeling of community metabolism which is ideally suited for this purpose. Next, we propose a simpler coarse-grained model, which is tailored to solve the inference problem from the experimental data. This model unambiguously relate to the more detailed genome-scale stoichiometric models which act as heterogeneous data integrators. The simpler inference models are, in our opinion, key to understanding microbial ecosystems, yet until now, have received remarkably little attention. This has led to the situation where the modeling of microbial communities, using only genome-scale models is currently more a computational, theoretical exercise than a method useful to the experimentalist.

Indexed as

community modelingflux balance analysisgenome-scale stoichiometric modelingmetabolismmetagenomic data integrationmicrobial communities

Identifiers

PMID25852671
PMCPMC4365725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.