Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25852596›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015

LIFESPAN: A tool for the computer-aided design of longitudinal studies.

Andreas M Brandmaier, Timo von Oertzen, Paolo Ghisletta, Christopher Hertzog, Ulman Lindenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bayesian power equivalence in latent growth curve models.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The challenge of measuring intra-individual change in fatigue during cancer treatment.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas M BrandmaierCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development Berlin, Germany.
Timo von OertzenDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Paolo GhislettaFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland ; Distance Learning University Switzerland Brig, Switzerland.
Christopher HertzogAdult Cognition Lab, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ulman LindenbergerCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development Berlin, Germany ; Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers planning a longitudinal study typically search, more or less informally, a multivariate space of possible study designs that include dimensions such as the hypothesized true variance in change, indicator reliability, the number and spacing of measurement occasions, total study time, and sample size. The main search goal is to select a research design that best addresses the guiding questions and hypotheses of the planned study while heeding applicable external conditions and constraints, including time, money, feasibility, and ethical considerations. Because longitudinal study selection ultimately requires optimization under constraints, it is amenable to the general operating principles of optimization in computer-aided design. Based on power equivalence theory (MacCallum et al., 2010; von Oertzen, 2010), we propose a computational framework to promote more systematic searches within the study design space. Starting with an initial design, the proposed framework generates a set of alternative models with equal statistical power to detect hypothesized effects, and delineates trade-off relations among relevant parameters, such as total study time and the number of measurement occasions. We present LIFESPAN (Longitudinal Interactive Front End Study Planner), which implements this framework. LIFESPAN boosts the efficiency, breadth, and precision of the search for optimal longitudinal designs. Its initial version, which is freely available at http://www.brandmaier.de/lifespan, is geared toward the power to detect variance in change as specified in a linear latent growth curve model.

Indexed as

effective errorlatent growth curve modelingoptimal designpower equivalence theorystatistical powerstructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID25852596
PMCPMC4371588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.